Search for: "Large v. Superior Court"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,458
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2020, 4:36 am
In a preliminary settlement filed in San Mateo Superior Court, the social network agreed to pay damages to American moderators and provide more counseling to them while they work. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:30 pm
Texas v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:12 pm
In another recent trial court decision on SB 35 (Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
This is largely the tack taken by Paradis, in his May 4 review of the shadow report. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of O’Mara-Conley v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:26 am
Superior Court, 132 Cal.App.4th 826, 833-35)). [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 12:26 am
South African courts have begun to hand down judgments electronically via email and publication on court websites, for example the case of Liberty Group Limited v Illman. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:41 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
In Ontario, the Superior Court of Justice has issued a notice stating that the Court “remains committed to the open court principle throughout the COVID-19 pandemic” and has detailed a procedure for the public and media to access remote proceedings. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
French argued that the governing case here is the Supreme Court case Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 8:46 am
Superior Court, 137 S. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
Under Roe, state laws banning or restrictively regulating abortion were invalid.After two decades of backlash and maneuvering by the anti-abortion movement (including violence against clinics and providers), the Court revisited Roe in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 1:22 pm
See State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:56 am
In Gibbons v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Superior Court (Rackauckas), no. [read post]
