Search for: "Lawrence v. Texas"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In 2003, when the Supreme Court finally overruled Bowers, Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 10:54 am
Tennesee v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 3:36 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Jonathan Nash suggests that two words in Armstrong v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Texas is correctly decided, but it would seem to me that the class legislation argument applies equally well to Lawrence. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:33 am
And in Bower v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:26 pm
Watch for the same thing to happen again in Texas. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Lamb and The Episcopal Church v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:31 pm
Robert v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
One development that both reflected and reinforced the shift in favor of marriage equality was the Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 2:32 pm
Supreme Court's historic decision in Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
The 1967 ruling in Loving v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
The 1967 ruling in Loving v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 10:22 am
(2) Given Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
The Court will hear argument first in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
" [Texas Tribune] https://www.scribd.com/doc/252991700/Indictment-U-S-v-Steven-Metro [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 12:11 pm
What the Court signals in its decision about the constitutionality of other anti-gay legislation will have substantial legal effects down the road, just as the Court’s decision in Romer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm
Evans, Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 14-144 (involving a First Amendment challenge to license plate restrictions), and Bullard v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm
As courts in a couple of other states have held, laws that make co-habitation illegal are unconstitutional under the reasoning of Lawrence v. [read post]
