Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 481 - 500 of 8,557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2023, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
An Employee is Laid-Off Because of COVID-19 In the recent decision Chalmers v Airways Transit Service Ltd. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:51 pm by Philip Thomas
Matt at Ipse Blogit lays out the chronology of events leading up to Karen’s sentencing hearing, including: In Karen Irby's petition (filed March 29), she says that while she was driving the car Stuart Irby began yelling at her and assaulting her. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:37 am by Stefanie Levine
So let’s take a look at another case: Mirror Worlds v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 5:33 am by Matt Danzer
After CDR Lockhart lays out the parties’ agreed upon schedule for the rest of the afternoon session, the court begins with AE 244, a defense motion to dismiss numerous charges as multiplicitous of other charges. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:37 am by Stefanie Levine
So let’s take a look at another case: Mirror Worlds v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 11:06 am by Christopher Danzig
Here at Above the Law, we regularly cover benchslaps: judges laying the smackdown on poorly performing attorneys. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Décision Les démarches nécessaires à l’obtention de l’expertise ne peuvent être qualifiées d’événement distinct selon R. c. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:13 pm
  Then the fake companies "lay off" the fake employees and the fake employees file for and collect unemployment benefits from the EDD, which the brothers then split. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
 The academic equivalent is 30 single-spaced pages of introductory text to a law review article that "lays out the problem" before even commencing with the point of the piece.Neither writing method makes things especially easy for the reader. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:47 pm by Garry J. Wise, Wise Law Office, Toronto
Consequently, where an employee's claims and entitlements exceed the statutory maximum, recovery under the Act is nonetheless limited to the global sum of $10,000.See, for example, Frimpong v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 4:43 am by Maxwell Kennerly
As Patently-O reports this morning,  The Supreme Court recently rejected Medela's petition for certiorari arguing that the conclusion of obviousness should be made by a judge rather than a lay jury. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:36 am by James Romoser
Supreme Court challenge over Pennsylvania’s 2020 election (Jonathan Lai, The Philadelphia Inquirer) Supreme Court Puts Off Ruling on Whether Census Tally Should Include Immigrants in U.S. [read post]