Search for: "Levy v. Levy"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,027
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 8:06 pm
This was seen in R. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:54 am
The recent dissents from en banc rehearing in Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
Prods. v R. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 11:07 am
Bent v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 11:00 am
In Mejia v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 12:41 pm
Thanks to Paul Alan Levy for the pointer. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 8:03 am
This procedure is reminiscent of the process used by Judge Wettick in Melvin v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 1:11 pm
”In U.S. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:23 am
” “The statute of limitations for a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice is three years (see CPLR 214[6]; Tulino v Hiller, P.C., 202 AD3d at 1135), which accrues at the time the malpractice is committed, not when the client discovers it (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166; Goodman v Weiss, Zarett, Brofman, Sonneklar & Levy, P.C., 199 AD3d 659, 661; Sclafani v Kahn, 169 AD3d 846, 848). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
This is most explicit in Johnston v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
See Bassett v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 8:01 am
On Monday, the Court heard argument in EC Term of Years Trust v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:55 am
Wikileaks and Rocky Mountain Bank v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
O’Neill Levy discusses two interesting points: when an expert is needed in a summary judgment motion on a legal malpractice case and whether an account stated claim can proceed in a legal malpractice counterclaim/defense setting. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 5:31 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:16 pm
Justice Levy decides that these offers do not have to be allocated since it's a joint recovery and there's a unity of interest, and hence that the 998 offer in this case validly shifted $41,000 in expert witness costs. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:41 am
Justice Richman joined the Court of Appeal over eight years ago, but the first time he used that phrase was two years ago -- in two different opinions -- and then used it again last year and, thus far, has used it again in two different opinions in 2014.The latest people to nonpluss Justice Richman are insurance adjuster Craig Hansen and his attorneys at Horvitz & Levy ("Appeals Are What We Do") and Weston & McElvain ("Building a Reputation"). [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
And as the Supreme Court said in Organization for a Better Austin v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:18 am
Howe Properties (NE) Ltd v Accent Housing Ltd (2024) EWCA Civ 297 Accent Housing levied a management fee on leaseholders which was at flat rate and a) differed by tenure (freehold and assured tenancies were at different rates) and b) was charged as against Accent’s management costs across its whole estate, some 3058 leasehold properties, not just this specific development. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm
In the 2007 case of Braun v. [read post]
