Search for: "Long Term Capital Holdings v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Submissions from outside the United States are welcomed. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:27 pm
The Su ­preme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
These questions have always deserved attention, but are taking on greater importance given the increased understanding of “horizontal” conflicts of interest that may arise “between activists (who tend to be short-term shareholders) and indexed institutional investors (who tend to be long-term investors and regard themselves as the company’s ‘permanent shareholders’). [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Jared Beck
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
By the time the conference returned to Boston in 2017, just as Donald Trump was taking office, partisanship had taken hold of a bipartisan group. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
  The answer was easy: “The United States must lead by the power of our example and not by the example of our power. [read post]
In particular, we were skeptical that Trump’s speech would satisfy the stringent requirement of Brandenburg v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am by William C. MacLeod
[The 14th entry in our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium is a guest post from Bill MacLeod, a former Federal Trade Commission bureau director and currently a partner with Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, where he chairs the firm’s antitrust practice and co-chairs its consumer protection practice. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
If the Applicant is an entity and not a natural person, Applicant shall identify all persons who are the managers, officers, directors, contractual agents, partners, and licensors of such entity, as well as all members, shareholders, or Investors holding an ownership interest of 5% or more of such entity. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
If the Applicant is an entity and not a natural person, Applicant shall identify all persons who are the managers, officers, directors, contractual agents, partners, and licensors of such entity, as well as all members, shareholders, or Investors holding an ownership interest of 5% or more of such entity. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
Whelan, in Flax v Shirian, 2014 NY Slip Op 51229(U) [Sup Ct, Suffolk County Aug. 15, 2014], the court mercifully decreed death for a hopelessly dysfunctional, multi-member real estate holding company identified by one side as 27th Street Associates, LLC, by the other side as 27th Street, LLC, and in the property deeds and records of the New York Department of State, as 27 Street LLC. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Second, the IBTA permitted the Secretary of State to delay a tender offer by holding a hearing on the offer’s fairness. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Other states may choose to take a different approach. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In 2007, the Commission consolidated the scaled disclosure requirements for smaller companies in Regulation S-K and introduced the term “smaller reporting company. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm by Roy Ginsburg
(n.10) Employment agreements, however, are not a complete or perfect solution to the problem of protecting an investment in human capital. [read post]