Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 4,033
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
United States, 92 U.S. 105 (1876); Tenet v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
In Gulati v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
Lord Sumption stated that this could not be the correct result stating: “The essential element in my view is not control of the environment in which the claimant is injured, but control over the claimant for the purpose of performing a function for which the defendant has assumed responsibility. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
Lord Sumption stated that this could not be the correct result stating: “The essential element in my view is not control of the environment in which the claimant is injured, but control over the claimant for the purpose of performing a function for which the defendant has assumed responsibility. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 2:59 am
This is one of the issues in the case Facebook v Voxer [2021] EWHC 1377 (Pat). [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
Panayiotou v Waltham Forest and Smith v Haringey. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 4:27 pm
Lord Abbett Municipal Income Fund Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:02 am
Lord Justice Floyd’s reasoning chimes with the Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, which states that “an application may only be objected to for lack of sufficient disclosure if there are serious doubts, substantiated by verifiable facts” (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, II, C.6.1.4). [read post]
Hanging By A Thread: Reportage and Clause 4 of the Defamation Bill – Sophie Walker and Jason Bosland
11 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
In the seminal cases of Al-Fagih v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am
Lord Brodie – Prosecutors lied to obtain warrant. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
Particularly, Lord Sumption, together with Lord Reed, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs, found that if claims 1 and 3 had been valid, they would not have been infringed, but differed in their reasons. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 1:45 am
Lord Reed identifies four principal errors in the judgment of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:35 pm
McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield District Council [2009] EWCA Civ 285 was an appeal of a summary possession that had been stayed pending Doherty in the Lords. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 3:14 am
The four different approaches adopted by the Law Lords in their speeches in the Pinochet case before the House of Lords, in particular, are doctrinally unsound as a means of restricting functional immunity. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am
The appeal to the Supreme Court is due to be heard by Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Clarke. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
(Both Jan Luba QC for Doherty and Philip Sales QC for the Secretary of State challenged this point and it was not uniformly accepted - see below). [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:57 am
For the majority, Lord Wilson gave the main judgment. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 2:13 am
Today the United Kingdom's Court of Appeal (Civil Division) released its judgment in AS & DD v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which concerned the lawfulness of the deportation of the applicant to Libya, pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding with the proposed receiving state. [read post]
