Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2013, 5:15 am
Netherlands (1979) 1 EHRR 647; Ozturk v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
Secretary of state had reasonable grounds for suspecting BF involved in terrorism. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:59 pm
I refer to the treatment of that decision by Lord Oliver of Aylmerton in A.G. v Guardian [1987] 1 WLR 1248 at 1319 D-E, referred to by Bingham LJ in the Court of Appeal in A.G. v Guardian Newspapers (No. 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 at 217C. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
College of Dental Surgeons of Puerto Rico v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 3:29 am
Even so, to benefit from this cash flow advantage, Lord Hodge states that the taxpayer must formally calculate his tax liability on the return itself; it is not enough simply to include the final figure as part of a covering letter. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
Lord Sumption rejected this, stating that the directives leave various matters to member states to determine, but the domestic schemes were nonetheless part of a scheme for implementing an EU tax. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
However, Lord Carnwath had two difficulties with this proposition. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lord Sumption gave the main judgment. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:08 am
On Jan. 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S, v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
Jurisprudence has evolved in the UK, Germany, Netherlands and other member states. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Neuberger and Lord Dyson referred to the four-limb test for proportionality in respect of interference with Convention rights as espoused by Lord Reed in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No. 2) [2013] UKSC 39. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am
Starting on Monday 30 January 2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:32 am
Considers whether the conditions of entitlement to State Pension Credit were compatible with Regulation 1408/71, which prohibits discrimination between nationals of different Member States. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:31 pm
Further, as Lord Coledridge said in Harris v Qarre (1879) 4 CPD 125, an action for defamation turns not on the fact of a defendant having used defamatory expressions, but the fact of him having used those defamatory expressions. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:06 pm
In last month’s unanimous judgment in Rothschild v Associated Newspapers Limited ([2013] EWCA Civ 197) the Court of Appeal upheld a decision that the defence of justification had been established in a claim brought by the financier Nat Rothschild against the Daily Mail. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
In Lord Carnwath’s view, the provision in s.67(8) RIPA for a route of appeal to the Secretary of State did not add anything, given that that power had not been exercised and was ultimately an executive power, so did not support the argument that the courts should not have ultimate control [104]. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 2:15 am
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of the Secretary of State. [read post]
