Search for: "M J.1."
Results 481 - 500
of 9,006
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
§§ 3161-3174. [7] Benjamin M. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
And it is to the issue of further development in the law of gender that this issue is devoted.Una vez más la has (la más antigua agrupación de abogados independientes de Cuba) da a la luz un nuevo número de su Boletín. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
[1,4] The “O” and “H” antigens on the bacteria and their flagella distinguish the different serotypes. [4] It is important to remember that most kinds of E. coli bacteria do not cause disease in humans. [1, 2] Indeed, some E. coliare beneficial, while some cause infections other than gastrointestinal infections, such as urinary tract infections. [1] The E. coli that are responsible for the numerous reports of… [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 11:26 am
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 642 (1943) (Jackson, J., writing for the Court)). [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:24 am
While a buyer might appreciate the artistic qualities of a work, the connection to a particular artist is a significant generator of the value of the work, creating the difference between the original potentially worth millions of dollars and a reproduction sold for a fraction of the cost.[1] Holding out a forgery as a legitimate work can have reputational and legal consequences for buyers, sellers, and institutions in the art world.[2] The buyer’s actions during the sale may… [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Clarke Professor of Law, Cornell Law SchoolNeil Buchanan, James J. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm
While a buyer might appreciate the artistic qualities of a work, the connection to a particular artist is a significant generator of the value of the work, creating the difference between the original potentially worth millions of dollars and a reproduction sold for a fraction of the cost.[1] Holding out a forgery as a legitimate work can have reputational and legal consequences for buyers, sellers, and institutions in the art world.[2] The buyer’s actions during the sale may… [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:11 pm
Recently, two lawyers wrote an article in a legal trade magazine about excluding epidemiologic evidence in civil litigation.[1] The article was wildly wide of the mark, with several conceptual and practical errors.[2] For starters, the authors discussed Rule 702 as excluding epidemiologic studies and evidence, when the rule addresses the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 9:09 am
J’kye Lovell Ray Watkins: Justice for Family? [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 5:54 am
Your commander-in-chief, Donald J. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
I’m not trying to brag. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Nielson, Professor of Law at Brigham Young University Law School, Christopher J. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 9:21 am
In a dispute inter alia concerning the lawfulness of a parody of well-known character Zorro under Italian copyright, the Supreme Court held that a parody is a type of quotation for purposes of criticism or review, in accordance with Article 70(1) of the Italian Copyright Act. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
There is nothing new here except: (1) the packaging which is now more refined and readable; (2) its cadence; and (3) its ready availability on line (in word searchable form that affects search analytics and a sense of the importance of the text). [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 10:13 pm
Milford, et al, (J Pediatrics, 1991) studied the importance of proteinuria at one year following the acute episode of HUS in 40 children. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 11:00 pm
June 22, 2023 Hardy, J.), the court denied a Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment based upon a spoliation of evidence argument. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
§ 1.501(c)(4)-1(a)(2). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am
I'm seeking for help. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:29 am
New Books EVIDENCE 1. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
The books are Patrick J. [read post]
