Search for: "M v. M" Results 481 - 500 of 55,010
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2024, 4:12 am by Eleonora Rosati
Here is what Eric writes:The current status and future of sound marksby Eric Möhlenberg Listening to the wind or the latest sound mark? [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
” Brian Bird and Kristopher Kinsinger next propose renaming and reframing unwritten constitutional principles as animating principles in “Constitutional Exegesis, Animating Principles and Toronto v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm by Eric Goldman
As I explain below, I’m not sure if the plaintiffs can overcome the standing problems created by the services’ content moderation freedom. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am by Asheesh Agarwal
  In the past, of course, the agencies have stated that “the vast majority of mergers are either procompetitive and enhance consumer welfare or are competitively benign”[5] and that “[m]ergers are one means by which firms can improve their ability to compete. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 2:27 pm
So big (psychic) win for the defendant.Doesn't make it worth all the hassle and expense, I'm sure. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
One problem with pseudonymous litigation is the proliferation of Doe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm by Eric Goldman
Otherwise, at best, you’re wasting your time, and at worst, your amendment process will fail and your TOS doesn’t say what you think it says. 2022 Course Enrollment The named plaintiff enrolled in a course in 2022, which also required them to agree to the TOS: (Avwerosuo Igho-godwin is a European software engineer, but not obviously working for Coursera, so I’m not sure how they got dragged into this). [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:27 pm by Josh Blackman
I'm still not sure what to make of Justice Gorsuch's concurrence. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:12 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I have been thinking some more about VC Travis Laster’s new opinion in Wagner v. [read post]