Search for: "MARRIAGE OF LAWRENCE"
Results 481 - 500
of 899
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
(In his dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
These landmark decisions for gay rights have sparked the question: is nationwide marriage equality on the way? [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am
Plenary Session Religion and Gender: Same-Sex Marriage Chair: Silvio Ferrari, Professor of Law and Religion, University of Milan Rex Ahdar, Professor of Law, University of Otago, New Zealand Ursula Basset, Professor of Law, Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina Douglas Laycock, Robert E. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:16 am
Windsor, striking down the federal Defense of Marriage Act, it is useful to first see what this case is not, but what, in lesser hands, it might have been.This is not a case about privacy, like Lawrence and Bowersbefore it. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 7:12 pm
” Put another way, after Windsor, Lawrence seems more and more now a case concerning the right to get engaged, while Windsor is about the right to marriage (and estate tax evasion) proper. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:29 pm
However, Kennedy uses the word dignity (or indignity) a total of 10 times in his fairly short opinion – signaling the importance of an interest that he used to invalidate a Texas law criminalizing non-coital sex in Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996) and Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:50 pm
No doubt it was irresistible for Anthony Kennedy, the senior justice in the majority, to give himself Windsor, given his earlier opinions in Romer and Lawrence. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Just as Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:25 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
On the tenth anniversary of its leading gay rights decision, Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:37 pm
In re-reading the marriage cases this afternoon, something struck me: where are the liberals? [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
” Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:37 pm
Or perhaps if enough states recognize same-sex marriage we will see the “emerging awareness” rationale of Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
That invalidation of Section 3 followed directly and indeed easily from the Court’s decision a decade ago today in Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:10 am
Bollinger, Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:01 am
Justice Antonin Scalia, dissenting in Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
