Search for: "MATTER OF C R O"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,791
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
The EBA has noted further that “[T]o restrict the application of R 28(c) (formerly R 23d(c)) to what an applicant chooses explicitly to put in his claim would have the undesirable consequence of making avoidance of the patenting prohibition merely a matter of clever and skilful drafting of such claims” (see point [22] of the Reasons). [21] The present Board does not see any reason to apply this approach of decision G 2/06 to the… [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
”In contrast section 8 of the Representation Agreement Act provides:Test of incapability for standard provisions8 (1) An adult may make a representation agreement consisting of one or more of the standard provisions authorized by section 7 even though the adult is incapable of(a) making a contract,(b) managing his or her health care, personal care or legal matters, or(c) the routine management of his or her financial affairs.(2) In deciding whether an adult is… [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:44 pm
It’s worth noting that Berger is Canadian and this was a Canadian tax matter – not a US tax matter. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:54 pm
The principal flaws in the proposed clause are in paragraphs (c) and (e). [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
Attorney), Sarah R. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 7:39 am
First, the party is prohibited from challenging the asserted patent at the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) (Sec. 2(c)). [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 7:29 pm
Takeaway: The applicants appealed subject-matter eligibility rejections made under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:03 pm
Indeed, in 108-page August 27, 2015 post-trial opinion (here), Delaware Court of Chancery Vice Chancellor Travis Laster found that and Murdock and C. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Requires Reversal of Neglect Orders In Matter of Jaikob O., --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4974840 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) the Appellate Division reversed an order which granted petitioner's application to adjudicate the children to be neglected. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:02 am
Bills C-46 and C-47 languished, however, and have yet to be discussed at committee. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
The Court observed that foster parents apply for the subsidy prior to adoption (18 NYCRR 421.24 [b], [c][1]), and sign a contract with ACS (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][3]). [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 2:07 pm
Section 101.93(f) simply restates part of the definition of the types of claims that may be made under section 403(r)(6) of the FD&C Act. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Considering matters on appeal in R (HC) [2017] UKSC 73 (discussed here), the Supreme Court explicitly approved of Elias LJ’s judgment in Harrison. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Code §§ 2703(a), (b) and (c) to disclose certain records and contents of electronic communications relating to an Apple e-mail address. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 7:45 am
By Brandi O. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:06 pm
Last month, I joined a panel discussion on blogging during a PLI program on social media led by LexBlog's Kevin O'Keefe. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 7:03 am
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel David C. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
509/09 et C? [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
R. 1.9 (A lawyer who formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter use or reveal information relating to the representation to the disadvantage of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent.) [read post]
