Search for: "MATTER OF K D K"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
I'd like to see a more robust commitment to the right to counsel -- by HRC and by K&S. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 4:38 pm
If a corporation is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a corporation’s board may effectuate the change to a virtual meeting by filing a publicly available document with the Securities and Exchange Commission, such as a current report on Form 8-K, and a press release that is posted on the company’s website. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
References within the Extension Agreements to the EPC, in particular to the so-called period of grace under R 85a(2) EPC 1973 (in combination with A 79(2) EPC 1973, R 107(1)(d) EPC 1973 and the EPO Rules relating to Fees), do not override this fundamental distinction. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
The board has considered the decisions cited by the appellant, but finds that they are not relevant to the facts in the present case.[5.6] Consequently the board finds that the subject-matter of claim 1 cannot be considered to involve an inventive step, A 56 EPC 1973.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.To have a look at the file wrapper, click here.You can find a post on a similar decision here. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
This implies that what is not defined by the Implementing Regulations does not qualify as a procedural defect in the sense of A 112a(2)(d). [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
The determination is subject to the important rider of taking into account matter which is implicit to a person skilled in the art. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
c); (d) a smoothing integrator (62) operatively connected to an output of said first multiplier and having an output representing pitch attitude command (? [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am
Denzin, Michael D. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The decision was based on the request filed on October 31.The Board of appeal found that the applicant’s right to be heard had been violated:Fundamental deficiencies[3] The appellant contests the decision of the ED essentially for both procedural and substantive matters. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
In the present case, the absence of explanation, both of the evidence itself and of its late production, makes matters worse. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 1:07 pm
She also is a widely published author and highly regarded speaker on these matters. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:15 am
But if you have other info about the firm that might be of interest, we’d love to hear it. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:03 pm
Rather in the present case they arise in the context of the evaluation of A 83 when considering the question of whether or not the claimed subject-matter can be carried out over the whole scope without undue burden, they therefore have been dealt with there […]. [96] In conclusion the subject-matter of […] claim 1 […] and claims dependent thereon involves an inventive step. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
The solution as claimed is, as discussed above, not considered obvious.Accordingly, the subject-matter of claim 1 involves an inventive step in the sense of A 56.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.To have a look at the file wrapper, click here.The decision has also been commented on Visae Patentes. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 11:01 am
Thus, after such publication, the skilled reader should be able to know, by reading the published application, the extent of the subject-matter which is within “the content of the application as filed”, and thus the extent of the subject-matter for which protection is or may be sought. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
See, for instance, document n° 4344/IV/63-D […] as well as proposition n° 2821/IV/63 of Kurt Haertel […].[8] Decisions under R 64(2) may be expected to be rare and appeals against them to be even more rare. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
They get all the credit, and any blame, for what appears in this post, the subject matter of which is the admissibility of FDA 510k clearance in mesh litigation. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:30 am
S . r e s i d e n t s o ve r a s m a n y t h r e e d e c a d e s . [read post]
