Search for: "MATTER OF S F JR" Results 481 - 500 of 1,165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:37 pm by Scott Bomboy
” The Supreme Court upheld the men’s convictions, but Justice Stanley F. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:38 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Holder Jr., the A.C.L.U. asserted that the documents showed that "the F.B.I. is illegally and unconstitutionally" targeting people for investigation based on their race or religion. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:38 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Holder Jr., the A.C.L.U. asserted that the documents showed that "the F.B.I. is illegally and unconstitutionally" targeting people for investigation based on their race or religion. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  In my column earlier this week discussing why societiess regulate businesses, I gingerly raised the issue of fact-checking in the context of an August 2023 claim by Robert F. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 7:54 am by Evan Lee
“[F]iling a notice of appeal is, generally speaking, a simple, nonsubstantive act that is within the defendant’s prerogative,” wrote Sotomayor. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:07 pm
Addiction: A Disorder of Choice (Harvard University Press, 2009).Hill, Thomas E., Jr. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 10:33 am by Lyle Denniston
Verrilli, Jr., could call up no prior ruling to support the policy choice the EPA had made on greenhouse gases by industrial plants, Kennedy left the impression that it might not matter. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 4:59 pm by rreeves
According to Signs of San Diego, the victim was a 66-year-old man whose daily routine involved breakfast at the Carl's Jr. restaurant. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Charlotte Butash, Hilary Hurd
… [C]ompelling one of the President’s immediate advisers to testify on a matter of executive decision-making would also raise serious con­stitutional problems, no matter what the assertion of congressional need. [read post]