Search for: "MATTER OF T A G"
Results 481 - 500
of 5,926
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2014, 7:33 pm
The matter was finally decided; it is not open for redetermination. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
” [3.2] Claim 1 of all these requests has been amended compared to claim 1 of the corresponding requests 2 to 4 filed with letter of 9 November 2011 by deleting the term “non-folded” which was discussed as not being allowable in the course of the OPs in view of its nature as a disclaimer with reference to the decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal G 1/03. [3.3] Accordingly, the now claimed subject-matter of claim 1 of the second to fourth auxiliary requests is… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:18 am
While the bar needs to investigate and discipline incompetent or dishonest attorneys, I have no idea why the Supreme Court decided to issue a February 15, 2012 public reprimand in In the Matter of William G. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
This is not under dispute. [5] The central point at stake however is which technical effects can be attributed to the claimed matter and which technical contribution the claimed matter makes over the prior art. [5.1] The primary purpose of the claims according to the main request, witness the preamble and the last feature of both independent claims, is the regeneration of runtime objects in response to changes made to development objects. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 3:09 pm
J 3/95 and T 167/93). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:53 pm
During the course of construction Earth Trades defectively performed its work and T&G terminated the contract. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
In this respect, the [opponent] cited inter alia decisions T 932/93 and T 358/08, which confirmed that a request according to R 99(1)(c) could be implicit, the extent of the appeal being a matter for the grounds of appeal. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
But words matter. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am
According to T 834/09, the librarian receiving the publication was already part of the public. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am
According to T 834/09, the librarian receiving the publication was already part of the public. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 7:29 pm
Is this just a matter of taste or is there a serious moral question here? [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am
In a another Board decision (T 777/15), this was denied. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
Therefore, an appellant is not entitled, as a matter of right, to present amendments of his own volition at the appeal stage, but as a matter of discretion to be exercised by the board. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
Hence, the condition defined in decisions G 2/88 and G 6/88 to recognise novelty of the use of a known compound for a particular purpose is therefore here not fulfilled. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:03 am
Are You Interested In Suing For 4-G or 5-G Illnesses? [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
However, this result does not necessarily imply the above mentioned negative feature. [2.2.6] This negative feature therefore adds subject-matter extending beyond the content of the application as filed. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
The conditions set out by the decision G 4/95 are applicable to any accompanying person. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
The EBA has noted further that “[T]o restrict the application of R 28(c) (formerly R 23d(c)) to what an applicant chooses explicitly to put in his claim would have the undesirable consequence of making avoidance of the patenting prohibition merely a matter of clever and skilful drafting of such claims” (see point [22] of the Reasons). [21] The present Board does not see any reason to apply this approach of decision G 2/06 to the situation underlying present… [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 5:01 pm
Katie G. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:01 pm
However, decision G 6/83 [2] has acknowledged the possibility of using Swiss-type claims. [read post]
