Search for: "MGN" Results 481 - 500 of 542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 5 December 2023 there was a hearing before Fancourt J in the case of Various Claimants v NGN dealing with consequentials following the settlement of all the claims listed for hearing in January 2024. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 28 to 30 January 2020 there will be a CMC in the phone hacking case of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 3 and 4 February 2022 the twenty-third CMC was held for the phone hacking litigation, Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
SMALL TALK vs BIG TALK (The IP Factor) Serbia Serbia joins Hague Agreement on International Designs (Class 99) South Africa Bad faith and bona fide intentions (Afro-IP) Switzerland No sweet success for Wander against Dr Oetker in trade dress dispute over caramel puddings (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Committal for contempt not fit for 'grey area' disputes: Grisbrook v MGN Ltd & Ors (IPKat) (PatLit) EWCA: Skilled reader 'taken to know patent law'; patent valid and… [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Newey LJ granted permission to appeal in the case of Various Claimants v MGN but did not order expedition. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 26 June 2019 Dame Victoria Sharp was sworn in as the new President of the Queen’s Bench Division, replacing Sir Brian Leveson who retired on 23 June 2019. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 15 July 2019 The Observer’s Carole Cadwalladr responded to libel claim made by from Arron Banks, calling it “wholly without merit” and an abuse of process. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  Let us take, for example, the leading case of Naomi Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457, concerning a well known model with a drug problem. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:52 am by INFORRM
Section 1(1) codified the common law rule adumbrated by Tugendhat J in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) (16 June 2010) (the claimant was successful at the subsequent trial: [2011] EWHC 1884 (QB) (26 July 2011); on Thornton and s1(1), see Cooke v MGN [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB) (13 August 2014) (currently under appeal); Lachaux v Independent Print [2015] EWHC 2242 (QB) (30 July 2015)). [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
The most important judgment of the week was in the case of Weller v Associated Newspapers ([2015] EWCA Civ 1176). [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  The remaining issues in the case of Eddie Jordan v MGN will be dealt with on 17 July 2017. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The inauguration of President Donald J Trump on 20 January 2017 was the biggest media story in the world this week. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am by INFORRM
The Editors’ Code of Practice Committee has finally made its “post Leveson” changes to the Code. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On 10 November 2023, Nicklin J dismissed Associated Newspaper Ltd’s (ANL) application for summary judgement against seven claimants bringing misuse of private information proceedings against the publisher of The Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday, and the MailOnline website, Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon & Ors v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2023] EWHC 2789 (KB). [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Ten years after the publication of an article about Naomi Campbell, the European Court of Human Rights decided that the recovery of success fees from the Mirror would be “disproportionate“, in MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04). [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 1:29 am by INFORRM
Prince Harry and former Labour deputy leader Tom Watson are the only remaining claimants pursuing legal action against News Group Newspapers (NGN) in their unlawful information gathering claim. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
MGN admitted liability for the misuse of Cunningham’s private information on five occasions, and agreed to pay significant damages, legal costs and read an apology in the High Court. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:23 pm by Lucy Reed
See for example Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, pa 132, where Baroness Hale sums it up: “The 1998 Act does not create any new cause of action between private persons. [read post]