Search for: "MURPHY v. UNITED STATES"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2009, 6:17 am
He had not, however, seen patients since 2001 and was no longer licensed to practice medicine in the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
In the wake of the Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:46 am
Republic of Philippines, 951 F.2d 1414, 1424 (3d Cir. 1991) (citing United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:53 am
The Murphy v Amway decision: The Murphy v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm
United States, No. 11-1324 (D.C. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:22 am
This chart helps me keep track: Dead Alive Case Circuit Affected States Year Case Circuit Affected States Year Murphy v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am
United States, which asks whether stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:45 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:43 pm
Careful and appropriate use of criminal history information is an important, and in many cases essential, part of the employment process of employers throughout the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 2:00 am
In Giaimo, the trial court adopted the hearing officer’s recommendation to apply a so-called “Murphy discount” — named after Murphy v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 6:59 am
Murphy and McGirt v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm
Havis persists: Part III — United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:30 am
From my vantage point, the reason Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:11 pm
See also ROONEY V. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:36 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:36 am
• Policy considerations and implications in United States v. [read post]
