Search for: "Mark v. Wish"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
Watkins then asked if defense wished to give additional oral argument. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm
That case was different in that Apple was arguing (and was found to be right) that the layout of its stores should enjoy trade mark protection. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm
If the police have not overstepped the mark by targeting individuals they believe to be entirely innocent, then where exactly is that mark? [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
The Court could not make an award of “vindicatory” damages, merely to mark the commission of the wrong; this was wrong in principle: see R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] 1 AC 245 [97-100]. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:20 am
The current law was explained in Capitol Records, Inc v Naxos of America, Inc, where the Court of Appeals set out that "... [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:39 am
" Keeping this in mind, I still wish for 2016 to bring closure for Florida on some of these important issues. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:19 am
[To make out an offence under s.92 Trade Marks Act 1994, the use of the trademark in question must be as an indication of trade origin. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
Luna, 577 U.S. ___, ___–___ (2015) ( per curiam) (slip op., at 4–5) (internal quotation marks omitted); Taylor v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 9:04 am
The case, Maryland v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:20 am
The ruling was Gable & Gotwals, Inc. d/b/a GableGotwals v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 10:31 am
The Court of Justice of the European Communities handed down its decision in Case C-385/07 P Der Grüne Punkt-Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Commission, supported by Vfw AG, Landbell AG and BellandVision GmbH, nearly 26 months after the ruling of the Court of First Instance which this 198 paragraph decision upholds.For those whose memory may not instantly recall the decision of 24 May 2007 or the facts that led to it, let the IPKat recap ...The German… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:18 am
Fish writes that Kagan’s dissent “marks her as someone to reckon with, both inside and outside the Court” and gives “some hope” to those wishing that she will be “the long-sought liberal counterweight to Antonin Scalia. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:38 am
"Disclosing business secrets to share purchasers" is an IP Draughts post by the ever-perceptive Mark Anderson, it being a review of the recent ruling in Richmond Pharmacology Limited v Chester Overseas Limited and others [2014] EWHC 2692 (Ch) noted by the IPKat here. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:43 am
My client, who was a cautious man, did not wish to enter the UK market with his CTM mark until such time as he had succeeded in getting a refusal of the newspaper’s UK application. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 11:27 am
One recent decision from Manitoba, Hart v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:01 am
I hope candidates enjoy these tutorials and wish them a relaxed time before the EQE. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:06 am
Runberg, Inc. d/b/a Zephyrs v McDermott, Will & Emery LLP and Bernard P. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 2:06 pm
In Matal v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
Here’s the webcast of the oral argument, where we were heard at the 1:02 mark. [read post]
