Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 19,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2009, 2:20 pm
Mark your calendars for Wednesday, November 18, 2009, from 2:00 - 3:00 p.m. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 3:04 pm
This dates back to the antebellum Supreme Court decision in Prigg v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm
One or more words that might reasonably be required by a competitor to describe similar goods/service cannot be such a badge.I'm going to be lazy here and simply paste in the relevant section of Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks [(1964) 111 CLR 51, in which Kitto J said:"In Registrar of Trade Marks v W. and G. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:30 am
Furthermore, the second syllable of each mark starts with the letter ‘m’, which is pronounced in the same way for both marks. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:00 am
William Conley held that the patent marking statute does not violate the "take care" clause of Article II of the United States Constitution. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
Alas, Brigadier General Mark Martins, now the chief prosecutor of the military commissions, can’t blog for Lawfare any more, as he did when he was in the field in Afghanistan. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 8:04 pm
” See Cohen v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:41 am
Coming on the heels of the OCC's victory in Wachovia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:32 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
V. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
In an effort by the owners of the mark BROOKLYN BREWERY to cancel registration of the mark BROOKLYN BREW SHOP, the U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 4:59 am
Lloyd Lifestyle Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:05 am
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:50 am
City of New York v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:59 pm
Kilts Resources LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:48 am
Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking action for failure to state a claim was granted. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:26 am
In determining whether the term GUARANTEED RATE has acquired distinctiveness, the TTAB considered the 6 factors set forth in In re Snowizard, Inc., 129 USPQ2d 1001, 1005 (TTAB 2018) (quoting Converse, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 10:09 pm
The viability of the applicant's alleged "use" was questioned in Couture v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 12:16 am
In 2016 they filed and international trade mark (IR) designating the EU and other territories. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm
May 3 marked the 60th anniversary of a little known case of American civil rights: Hernández v. [read post]
