Search for: "Marriage of Smith" Results 481 - 500 of 1,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2007, 6:19 am
" Curt Smith of the Indiana Family Institute said the amendment is important to pass before actions in other states to legalize same-sex marriage are brought to Indiana's doorstep. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 2:12 pm
ANSWER:  Mary Smith, as the surviving spouse, only gets some of the assets, even though it was a long marriage and they have several kids together. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm by Paul Smith
Paul Smith is the vice president of Litigation and Strategy at the Campaign Legal Center. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
The dissenting justices in the gay marriage case, Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Smith could be told that she had to design them or lose her job. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm by Amy Howe
Hodges, recognizing a right to same-sex marriage, indicated that religious groups could still “advocate with utmost, sincere conviction that, by divine precepts, same-sex marriage should not be condoned. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:29 am by Howard Friedman
”...Petitioners remain free to advocate the idea that same-sex marriage betrays God’s laws.... [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 1:07 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Infidelity leads to divorce and is one of the most damaging things that can ever happen to a marriage. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 10:11 am by Michelle Harner
I was honored last week to attend the Fourth Annual Law & Entrepreneurship Retreat, hosted by Gordon Smith at the BYU Law School. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
” In Smith v Smith, (1987) 12 RFL (3d) 50 (BCSC), the court held that a 20-year-old unemployed high school dropout with aspirations of a career in modelling continued to qualify as a child of the marriage, because of a “somewhat depressed economy. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
Smith’s excellent dissenting opinion in this momentous case, I respectfully dissent from the failure to grant the petition for rehearing en banc [read post]