Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law" Results 481 - 500 of 1,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  One searches the Branch opinion in vain for any such rule of law; the decision doesn’t even contain a syllabus. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
Wolf allowed courts to apply “neutral principles of law” to resolve such matters, though courts could still defer. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 10:27 am by Dawn Mertineit
Now that we know that SCOTUS will weigh in on a question that has been percolating for years, the big question is, of course, how the Court will rule. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am by John Elwood
But in addition to that plain-vanilla administrative law question, the petition has a second question that is a potential blockbuster: Whether the court should overrule Chevron or at least clarify whether statutory silence about the matter of payment constitutes an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:43 am by Attorney Articles
Estis Well Serv., L.L.C., 768 F.3d 382 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 135 S. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:43 am by Jenna Ard
Estis Well Serv., L.L.C., 768 F.3d 382 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 135 S. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 3:51 am
The CAFC today decided a much-anticipated patent law case, In re Bilski. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 6:45 am by Charles Kotuby
Additionally, the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit rests on a federal question, not a diversity matter, so the Ninth Circuit should apply the federal common law test. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm
  So the principal question on which the Smith Court granted cert was whether that was a valid argument. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 2:43 am by SHG
” admitted for the truth of the matter asserted? [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:24 am by Rory Little
(No justice mentioned the Mendezes’ briefed argument that the county’s cert petition had presented three questions but then reduced them to two somewhat different questions at the merits stage.) [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
By reversing on the grounds of the appellate court’s procedural overreach, the Supreme Court dodged the substantive question of whether the law is unconstitutionally overbroad. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 5:57 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The Supreme Court is surely going to find this question right back on their doorstep next year. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 7:19 am by Unknown
., arguing that the settled order included findings that he had violated the securities laws. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:55 am by Greg Mersol
App. 4th 805, cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1041 (2001), a California Court of Appeals launched a tsunami of wage and hour litigation against the insurance industry by holding that certain Farmers claims adjusters were non-exempt as a matter of law. [read post]