Search for: "Matter of Charles B."
Results 481 - 500
of 1,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court, Roger B. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 10:56 am
Heirs that agreed to do something = doesn’t matter given the statutory language. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:57 am
(Here's a similar speech he gave a year earlier).Malthus' description of a general pattern of human history (and indeed of the history of all living things, an observation that inspired Charles Darwin) was by and large accurate. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:25 pm
Kiteley presided over the Applicant’s family law matter involving her former spouse. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
For just one example of another case raising this question, see the Lawrence Charles Matthews child pornography case.) 1. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:48 pm
Practically all the witnesses questioned on that matter, most of them magistrates, insist that their constables would never do such a thing. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Charles Smith’s discrete testimony had allegedly contributed to a number of miscarriages of justice relating to infant deaths. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Brian Salter, CPA, and Phillip B. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
Charles Williams, Jr. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
” Just this past March, FBI Director James B. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
After argument, the trial judge granted the County's [Court Rules] 12(b)(6) motion, determining as a matter of law that records of private cell phone use can never be public records under the PRA. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 10:03 am
Milton Handler & Charles Pickett, Trade-Marks and Trade Names-An Analysis and Synthesis: I, 30 Colum. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:23 am
This case involves two certified state law questions from Judge Charles M. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 10:00 pm
Sept. 22, 2015), Kentucky Senior District Judge Charles R. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:07 pm
My point is far more modest: as a matter of constitutional law, federal statutes, and simple common sense, refugee admission and resettlement is up to the federal government, and not the states. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 8:41 pm
At the conclusion of the three-week trial, the court, pursuant to CPLR 4111(b), submitted various special interrogatories which it had formulated to the jury without objection by any party. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:43 pm
Sacks and Rachel B. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 4:45 am
Factors that matter AKC did not have a contractual right to control C&B’s performance but could have actually exercised such control in a manner that would give rise to a legal duty to C&B’s employees. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
An exemption is appropriate as long as the effect on the receiving school sites is the lesser of (a) increase in student population over 25% over existing capacity or (b) ten classrooms. [read post]
