Search for: "Matter of Crawford" Results 481 - 500 of 1,015
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2012, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
He added: “I thought was a matter of significant public concern… I would have hoped and expected that Suffolk police would have decided to put some information on that into the public domain as quickly as possible so that when Suffolk awoke that morning, the members of the public were forewarned that there was a possibility of these three being in the local area and not to approach them, or indeed if they saw them, obviously to contact the police. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 7:14 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is also supported by Texas case law in the 1987, Texas Supreme Court case, Crawford v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:04 pm by Michael Froomkin
But since they will be part of the new Communication Cartel, that won’t really matter. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am by Conor McEvily
Crawford discusses how a decision striking down the ACA provision that expands Medicaid “might expose environmental and educational laws to legal challenges while hurting stocks. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:12 am by Tom Remington
The Court of Appeal decision in Crawford and another v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 provides guidance as to the procedural standards required in misconduct cases in which dismissal is likely to impact on the employee's ability to pursue his/her chosen career. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:12 am by Tom Remington
Accordingly, great care should be taken when deciding whether to suspend an employee or report a matter involving the employee to the police. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 8:54 am by Doug Cassel
They explained that two more appellate rulings in support of their judgment (including one entered before the Commission’s request) now made the matter less urgent. [read post]
J
15 Mar 2012, 6:31 am by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
Just a very quick note on a habeas opinion issued yesterday that deals with the Confrontation Clause and Crawford. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
Joseph) The Buzz in Information Law – Updates on eDiscovery from Redgrave - bit.ly/wuj188 (Redgrave LLP) The List: KMWorld 100 Companies That Matter in Knowledge Management - bit.ly/yuIwbQ (Hugh McKellar) Sight and Sound Emails from Private Intelligence Agency Stratfor End Up on Wikileaks | LXBN TV - bit.ly/yjZbyJ (Colin O’Keefe, John Lacey) @LXBN Finders, Keepers: How Vendor Websites Can Turn Visitors into Buyers – bit.ly/yD7cPx… [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:25 pm by Hakemi
Justice Crawford discussed a number of interesting aspects of defamation law in British Columbia including whether hyperlinks are defamatory (referring to the recent decision in Crookes v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:50 am by admin
Justice Crawford discussed a number of interesting aspects of defamation law in British Columbia including whether hyperlinks are defamatory (referring to the recent decision in Crookes v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:46 am by admin
Justice Crawford discussed a number of interesting aspects of defamation law in British Columbia including whether hyperlinks are defamatory (referring to the recent decision in Crookes v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:36 am by Russ Bensing
Cooper represents probably the 8th’s best work in a Crawford case, and we’ll discuss that aspect of the decision tomorrow. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:36 am by Marvin Ammori
I also worked on unlicensed spectrum and privacy and copyright, including recently on SOPA, and wrote about national security and civil liberties, and global free speech matters. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
  Even worse, there’s a Crawford problem, because the observations of the police officers were contained in the report, as well as statements from people who never appeared at trial; neither, for that matter, did the police officers. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:32 am by Russ Bensing
  Trespass, though, is a matter of property law, and here Scalia’s purpose is clear:  he wants to unmoor Fourth Amendment law from Katz  and return it to a property-interest analysis. [read post]