Search for: "Matter of Crowe" Results 481 - 500 of 971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am by Guest Blogger
The dimensionality of race is demonstrated by the peculiar fact that although modern liberals and Jim Crow resolve each of the two core inquiries reflected in Table 3 in opposite fashion, both allow some use of race, whereas the color blind position resolves in favor of each camp on one issue (failing to condone adverse reliance on race, along with modern liberals, and failing to condone benign reliance on race, along with Jim Crow), yet insists upon an opposite outcome respecting… [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:23 pm by John Floyd
”   Black Lives Matter   Black Lives Matter charges that Clinton’s “three strikes” provision contributed to the nation’s “mass incarceration” policy which is now under bipartisan congressional criticism for being both too harsh and unnecessary. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
Wade, and, for that matter, the work of those seeking to establish a right to death with dignity. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The filmmakers did what they really dislike doing: Eating crow by admitting that they were wrong! [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:14 am by Robert Kreisman
Kreisman Law Offices has been handling civil trial matters for individuals, families and businesses for more than 40 years. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:48 pm by Kyle Krull
"Elder abuse is a very serious matter that affects one of Tennessee's most vulnerable populations. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:10 am by Suzette Pringle
  Despite the remedial actions taken by State Street and its cooperation with the agency, State Street paid $12 million to settle the matter with the SEC. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:26 pm by Ron Coleman
Mars is lucky Judge Chin didn’t actually rule on the question as a matter of law, considering that parody hardly seems plausible here, though Burck urged him to do so in a motion to strike parody as an affirmative defense. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 1:45 pm by Michael Payne
Payne is the Chairman of the firm’s Federal Contracting Practice Group and, together with other experienced members of the group, frequently advises contractors on federal contracting matters including bid protests, claims and appeals, procurement issues, small business issues, and dispute resolution. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:54 am by SHG
While guns don’t matter a whole lot to me personally, truth does. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:43 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: CIVIL – WATER RIGHTS ADJUDICATION DA 15-0370, 2015 MT 353, IN RE THE CROW WATER COMPACT, IN THE MATTER OF THE ADJUDICATION OF EXISTING AND RESERVED RIGHTS TO THE USE OF WATER, BOTH SURFACE AND UNDERGROUND, OF THE CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS OF THE STATE OF MONTANA [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 10:32 am by Adam Steinbaugh
But none of this matters, at least as far as the Post's publication is concerned. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:40 am by marcorandazza
 “The Southern aristocracy took the world and gave the poor white man Jim Crow,” King said in 1965. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
It also arose after the war, when Warren’s views on matters of race and ethnicity gradually evolved under the influence of new acquaintances. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Many of the activists on campus are veterans of the Black Lives Matter campaign, which first emerged in Ferguson, Missouri. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 4:40 am by Benjamin Wittes
Unlike the specific role of the Snowden revelations in informing the tactical choices of the attackers, this is a matter on which we can expect information to develop. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by chief
In which the Nearly Legal team gain exclusive access to a (highly) fictionalised account of one man’s inside view of legislation currently going through Parliament, insofar as it relates to housing *** Morley Peckwitch, Member of Parliament for Dunny-on-the-Wold, leaned against the bar in the Smoking Room. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm by David Cheifetz
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]