Search for: "Matter of Garland" Results 481 - 500 of 1,004
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2017, 4:29 am by SHG
No matter what, it would never have been a judge who would please Greenhouse. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 6:52 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
  On the Hill, a good measure of the focus has been on process – the norm-breaking surrounding the refusal to give Merrick Garland a hearing, the refusal to disclose all of Kavanaugh’s professional records; the vociferous and at times disruptive behavior of public protestors; the handling of Ford’s accusation and the FBI investigation that followed. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Quinta Jurecic, Alan Z. Rozenshtein
As the brief puts it, the “President’s speech on a matter of public concern is not protected by absolute immunity if it constitutes incitement to imminent private violence. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
While "independence and impartiality" are among the chief "values" of the Justice Department, that is as a matter of internal policy and norms, not statute. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 1:40 am by centerforartlaw
In mid-July I finished my run at the Department of Justice in and joined the partnership at Steptoe – a law firm that I came to know through my work at DOJ for its expertise in international investigations and matters of economic countermeasures and asset forfeiture. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 6:41 am by John Jascob
“Attorney General Garland has made clear it is unambiguously this department’s first priority in corporate criminal matters to prosecute the individuals who commit and profit from corporate malfeasance,” said Monaco.To bolster individual accountability, Monaco has directed the DOJ to restore prior guidance that makes clear that to be eligible for any cooperation credit, companies must provide the department with all non-privileged information about individuals… [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 2:30 pm by Heather K. Gerken
 Put differently, it’s not federalism that matters here, but pluralism. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:28 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Those four votes are reliably for the state almost no matter what the circumstance. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 6:17 am by Frank Pasquale
That was not a rational basis for refusing to consider Merrick Garland. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:56 pm
Even though this matter involved a former President and possible future candidate, the DOJ did not make its application to a sitting federal judge in Florida, but went to a lowly U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Based on that experience, indictment alone—no matter how damning—does not seem likely to result in Menendez’s expulsion.However, the record is somewhat more mixed than it might at first appear. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 10:55 am by Michael Lowe
  In federal matters, an independent federal agency created by Congress in 1984, the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), will fix their punishment through its sentencing guidelines. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 1:02 pm
" Today in The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has an article headlined "Replacing Justice Stevens on high court is not just a matter of ideology. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 2:50 pm by Douglas A. Berman
Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the outgoing top Democrat on judicial matters, in a statement as Congress left town last week. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 4:58 am by Edith Roberts
McCain … was a voice of restraint on these matters,” he now “recklessly encourages Republican voters to expect that GOP senators will refuse any Democratic Supreme Court nominee. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 1:47 pm by Steve Gottlieb
The difference between judging and doing justice matters. [read post]
Attorney General Merrick Garland said, “It does not matter if you are a trafficker in a drug cartel or a corporate executive or medical professional employed by a health care company, if you profit from the unlawful distribution of controlled substances, you will be held accountable. [read post]