Search for: "Matter of Howard v Howard" Results 481 - 500 of 1,169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Lateef Mtima, Howard University: Hathitrust as template for social justice arguments in copyright. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm by Deborah C. Malamud
 For example, in discussing Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am by Ben
A series of leaked emails seen by TorrentFreak ends with the MPAA’s Howard Gantman saying  “So the end result contains sections on fair use that are more extensive than we would use if we drafted the curriculum ourselves. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm by Nicholas R. Parrillo
Indeed, many have argued that the aspiration of Brown v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 11:05 am by Kollias & Giese, P.C.
  This trend in allowing a guardian more decision-making authority was solidified in 2012, when the Illinois Supreme Court decided the case Karbin v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Finally, both judges acknowledge that the applicable test may not be well-suited for application to sharing economy companies, but say the matter is out of the courts’ hands: The application of the traditional test of employment—a test which evolved under an economic model very different from the new “sharing economy”—to Uber’s business model creates significant challenges….It is conceivable that the legislature would enact rules particular to the… [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 6:55 am by Michael Geist
The Supreme Court of Canada heard arguments yesterday in the copyright case of CBC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:48 am by Broc Romanek
This motion to amend the complaint in Chen v Howard-Anderson (“aka Occam”), CA No. 5878-VCL (Del. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 2:06 pm by Howard Knopf
About half of these involve have arisen from judicial review of Copyright Board decisions.CBC v SODRAC will focus on technological neutrality. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:42 am by SHG
When the ACLU prevailed in National Socialist Party of America v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm by MOTP
The Texas high court for civil matters concludes that the Texas law at issue (Section 74.451 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code), does not squarely fall within the scope of a state law enacted to regulate the business of insurance. [read post]