Search for: "Matter of Johnson v Johnson" Results 481 - 500 of 3,500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2018, 1:15 pm
Johnson, the 1989 case that established that the First Amendment protects flag-burning. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:49 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Rhode Island Rule of Evidence 801(c) defines hearsay as a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.... [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
 Under TFL's advertising policy, no advertisement is approved if it is "likely to cause widespread or serious offence" or "related to matters of public controversy or sensitivity". [read post]
THE
2 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm by CAPTAIN
THE CAPTAIN REPORTS:(Rump, with respect to the Essen family, I post these matters. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
Hotak (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Kanu (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Johnson (Appellant) v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent)Crisis & Shelter, EHRC, SS for CLG interveners [2015] UKSC 30 The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:29 am by Ad Law Defense
  In the end, that tactical decision didn’t matter. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:29 am by Abbe R. Gluck
From the Catholic Diocese and Boy Scouts in their respective abuse cases to Johnson & Johnson’s talc litigation, 3M’s earplug case, and Revlon’s hair straightener case, corporations are turning to bankruptcy court over the traditional civil litigation process. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As a threshold matter, neither Rubenstein nor Horowitz & Rubenstein are alleged to have acted as attorneys in this action, and Judiciary Law § 487 “applies to an attorney acting in his or her capacity as an attorney, not to a party who is represented by counsel and who, incidentally, is an attorney” (Oakes v Muka, 56 AD3d 1057, 1058). [read post]