Search for: "Matter of Mark" Results 481 - 500 of 28,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
The answer, began Mann J, was that it “is a matter of construction of the letter in question” – 10/10 if you wrote that. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 8:04 pm by Dennis Crouch
The brief is certainly not the best ever filed, but it raises important points: Scandalous Marks: The Government incorrectly asserts that the Clause only prohibits registration of marks that contain “profanity, excretory or sexual” matter — despite the plain language of the text. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Brigadier General Mark Martins is, at this hour, giving the following address to the New York City Bar Association:   Remarks of Brigadier General Mark Martins Chief Prosecutor, Military Commissions To the New York City Bar Association Tuesday, January 10, 2011 “Legitimacy and Comparative Law in Reformed Military Commissions” Good evening, and thank you, Jim, for that generous introduction and for the warm hospitality you have shown Kate and me and our… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:35 am by Dennis Crouch
Code § 1052) authorizes the PTO to refuse registration of marks that are: immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute… [or certain geographic indicators for wine/spirits] In Tam, the Supreme Court held that the prohibition on registering marks that disparage persons was a… [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Photo by Mark Lemley:Does it matter whether Winebook sells both wine and books? [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:02 am by John Diekman
The courts are closed to mark Memorial Day. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 4:14 am by John L. Welch
On the other hand, another line of cases holds that when the common or appropriated matter is highly suggestive or merely descriptive, or is frequently used or registered by others in the field, the addition of a house mark or other matter may serve to distinguish the marks. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:52 am
 A conflict ensued and Langenscheidt took the matter to court, alleging trade mark infringement under § 14 (2) No. 2 German Trademark Act. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 11:24 am by Perry Dane
They insist that, for that matter, the Anglican Church didn't even exist when Richard died. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 8:52 am by Jay Wolman
 There are two high profile matters in separate courts of appeals challenging the constitutionality of Section 2(a), which prohibits the registration of disparaging marks. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:00 am
  To some degree, the ICC can protect itself against misjudgment by affording states ever broader deference to judge these matters by themselves, but doing so risks ignoring that the ICC exists in large part to impose limits on state discretion. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
It doesn't matter how much time has passed from when you began using the mark; what matters is whether you abandoned the mark during that period. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 9:08 am by Staff Attorney
  Brokers must publicly disclose reportable events on their CRD customer complaints, IRS tax liens, judgments, investigations, and even criminal matters. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The Second Circuit has rejected the doctrine as a matter of federal law. [read post]
9 Jan 2006, 6:21 pm
"Mark Twain offered this quantitative observation about one of his favorite vices - alcohol. 'Too much,' he said, 'is not enough,'" begins this article from the Boca Raton News. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
See TMEP § 1213.03(a) (“If a mark is comprised in part of matter that, as applied to the goods or services, is generic or does not function as a mark, the matter must be disclaimed to permit registration on the Principal Register (including registration under §2(f) of the Act) or on the Supplemental Register. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:16 am
That was the issue considered by The Intellectual Property Office of Singapore's (IPOS) in the opposition matter of U-Manga International Business Co., Ltd v nunufish.com . [read post]