Search for: "Matter of Robert M."
Results 481 - 500
of 4,320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2022, 4:32 pm
" Robert D. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J gave two examples of the common good: the case concerned a ban on religious advertising in section 10(3) of the Radio and Television Act, 1988 (also here), and Barrington J (at [30]) held that the ban in section 10(3) could be justified either to prevent public unrest, or to ensure that, in matters of sensitivity, rich people “should not be able to buy access to the airwaves to the detriment of their poorer rivals”. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:00 am
I reluctantly concede that I'm impressed. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
That broader power to hear a claim at all is called subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:55 am
I expect that my co-bloggers and I will return to critique sooner or later, but for now I'm going to focus on the stare decisis issue as an abstract matter. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
This post is about uncomfortable truths, how we deal with them, and why this matters to the elusive quest for diversity and innovation. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 12:56 pm
Robert Weisberg is the Edwin E. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 11:34 am
I'm with Newsom. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
But in this case, because of the subject matter, they are all white men. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:26 am
It's not certain, of course, especially as to Roberts; still, Kavanaugh's pronouncement here strikes me as highly significant. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Like most secular Jews, I’m particularly interested in a particular Talmudic passage that Levine cites, Bava Metzia 59b, from the Babylonian Talmud. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Introduction: Mark McKenna: This is a conversation about what it means to be a TM and what it means to use matter in a way that violates a TM right. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm
Here is my very tentative summary of what appears to me on first read, based on Justice Thomas's majority opinion (joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett) plus a bit from Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence, joined by Chief Justice Roberts: [1.] [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 10:59 am
Family Responsibilities What if an employee tells an employer, “I’m happy to return back to the office, but I have ongoing child care issues, I’m not going to be able to come in. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
In order to deal with this matter better, we send email to you and confirm whether your company have connection with this Chinese company or not? [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:00 am
Canadian Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly, Danish Foreign Minister Jeppe Kofod, and Greenlandic Prime Minister Múte B. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:18 am
JUSTICE BREYER stresses the importance of “government neutrality” when it comes to religious matters... [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Robert J. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 8:24 am
I'm not sure whether on balance such social media quasi-common-carrier rules are a good idea, but I thought the essay was worth passing along. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
” The authors begin their analysis of specific causation with a brief acknowledgement that our legal system could abandon any effort to set standards or require rigorous thinking on the matter by simply leaving the matter to the jury.[9] After all, this laissez-faire approach had been the rule of law for centuries. [read post]
