Search for: "Matter of Singh v Singh" Results 481 - 500 of 512
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2009, 9:54 pm
Second Circuit notes immigration judge erred in taking judicial notice without providing an opportunity to rebut the officially noticed fact, in Singh v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 9:54 pm
Second Circuit notes immigration judge erred in taking judicial notice without providing an opportunity to rebut the officially noticed fact, in Singh v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 3:42 am
Soli Sorabjee was the Attorney General for India under the BJP government from 1998-2004, was probably involved in drafting POTA, and successfully defended the validity of POTA before the Supreme Court in PUCL v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (IPRoo), Giving Goliath the slingshot: Review of the National Innovation System on 'the costs of enforcing IP rights': (Australia & New Zealand Intellectual Property Law), Take patent policy away from lawyers, says Australian government report: (IAM), Advisory Council announces review of scope of patentable subject matter: (International Law Office), Federal Court's flu shot for patent law: Notice to Practitioners - Proceedings under the Patents Act 1990 (Cth):… [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:07 pm
The driver and passenger of the second car sued and sought punitive damages, but the trial court granted the defendant's motion for summary adjudication on the punitives claim, finding there was no evidence that the defendant engaged in the sort of "despicable" conduct that could support punitive damages under California law.The plaintiffs appealed, arguing as a matter of law that anyone involved in a hit-and-run accident is guilty of the sort of despicable conduct. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:02 am
The evidence, if evidence be needed, is that we all - including the International Court of Justice - have frequently had occasion to turn to ILC studies on particular matters. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:30 am
Tomorrow, (May 19) an interesting SLP is coming up as a fresh matter before the Vacation Bench of Justice C.K.Thakker and Lokeshwar Singh Panta in the matter of Union of India v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:51 pm
Because the record shows that such an increase in commuting time is de minimis as a matter of law, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment that none of the plaintiffs' commuting time is compensable under the FLSA....In the commuting context, we believe that the appropriate application of the predominant benefit test is whether an employer's restrictions hinder the employees' ability to use their commuting time as they otherwise would have had there been no work-related… [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:24 am
Singh Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYCivil Practice Plaintiff Can Amend Claim; Addition Does Not Alter Liability Theory Holmes-Thompson v. [read post]