Search for: "May v. Board of Directors" Results 481 - 500 of 5,429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2010, 10:06 pm
In some cases where a board believes that a director may disclose confidential records inappropriately, it may be okay to withhold records, but it would be important to get legal advice in a situation like that. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:40 am by Peter Mahler
She also served on AC Holdco’s Board of Directors until she was removed in June 2018. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:03 am
In the second the Director of the USPTO upheld the Board's denial of the motion to amend.Renata Foucré, Erin Hartman and Heather Marlow v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
Section 1101(a) specifically requires that the Board of Directors "approve" an "agreement of merger". [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm by Amy Ross
It is well-established that a shareholder-plaintiff may not assert derivative claims against a corporation’s officers or directors unless he or she makes a pre-suit demand on the corporation’s board of directors and alleges particularized facts showing that the demand was wrongfully refused, or alleges particularized facts showing that a demand on the board would have been futile. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:25 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its ruling in North Carolina Department of Corrections v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:17 am
Director Pay Posted by Kosmas Papadopoulos, ISS Analytics, on Monday, May 6, 2019 Tags: Boards of DirectorsDirector compensation, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Long-Term value, Ownership, Pay for performance, Peer groups, Surveys Corporate Board Practices in the S&P 500 and Russell 3000: 2019 Edition Posted by Matteo Tonello, The Conference… [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:45 am
Click here for the opinion, which seems poised to change the landscape for evaluating what boards of directors are required to when sizing up a merger proposal. [read post]
Healey, the entire board of directors (consisting of seven non-executive directors and the chief executive officer) was found to have breached its duty in failing to notice a significant error in the financial statements, an error that also went uncorrected by the outside auditors and internal employees. [read post]