Search for: "McKinney v. McKinney"
Results 481 - 500
of 649
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
In McKinney v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm
This holding is unsurprising, given the legislative history of the statute, which was enacted to combat “video voyeurism” following an incident where a woman was secretly recorded in her bedroom by her landlord, who had concealed a hidden camera in a smoke detector (People v Schreier, supra, at 497-498, citing Donnino, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws, Book 39, Penal Law § 250.40, at 250).Earlier, in People v Piznarski, 113 AD3d… [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
MoreIn favor of the Condemned Timothy Terell McKinney v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 4:38 am
— from Wage and Hour Laws Blog Myles v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:28 am
” Zucker v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:35 pm
.; Roberts, Julian V., editor. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 7:00 am
In Board of Managers of Hester Gardens v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 11:44 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Nathan McKinney v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
McKinney School of Law, Christine Nero Coughlin, Wake Forest University – School of Law. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:46 pm
Heartland LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:45 am
McKinney Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0197n.062008/04/16 USA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
,McKinney v. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am
They spoke about what this Trump administration effort reveals about the relationship between presidents and the intelligence community: David Priess shared a Lawfare Live event with the Michael V. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am
By Sophia Williams From 1933 to 1945, during the Nazi party’s rise to power, the Nazis looted, confiscated, or involuntarily transferred more than half a million artworks owned by Jewish art collectors and other victims.[1] Following Nazi party looting before and after World War II, thousands of artworks ended up in museum collections around the world, including in New York, and remain there today.[2] A recent act passed in August 2022 “to amend the education law, in relation to notice… [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:31 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am
In lieu of granting leave to appeal the Court reversed the Court of Appeals in People v McKinney, concluding that the defendant’s statement that he would “just as soon wait” until he had an attorney before talking to the police, followed immediately by his statement that he was willing to discuss the “circumstances,” was not an unequivocal assertion of the right to counsel or a statement declaring an intention to remain silent under Davis v… [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Smith v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
"The Freed decision was followed in a May 28, 2010 memorandum and order in Earls v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
