Search for: "Michael L. Numbers" Results 481 - 500 of 2,375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2019, 3:46 am by SHG
As empathetic as they may be in articles and at faculty meetings, they have no problem adding zeroes behind whatever number they pick. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:15 am by Bill Marler
Genetic testing showed that Myles Herschaft and Colton Guay were infected with an indistinguishable strain of E. coli O111 identified as PulseNet Pattern Identification Numbers XDX01.1540/EXDA26.1144. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:22 am by Josh Fensterbush
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1]The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3]Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans a [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
One reason the tax is unpopular is that the number of health insurance plans subject to this tax could grow over time. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Michaels, 1975 CanLII 15 (SCC), [1976] 2 S.C.R. 324, at p. 331. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
We asked the 2018-19 Davis Fellows the following question: how has your time at the Davis Center led to new insights about the reach and limits of law and legalities? [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:10 am by Colby Pastre
5/31/19 update: President Trump threatened to impose tariffs at a rate of 5 percent on all imports from Mexico, worth $346.5 billion, until, he said, illegal immigration across the southern border was stopped. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am by Jessica Kroeze
Does the finding that (a disclosure in) a prior art document D1 does not qualify as an accidental anticipation (thus not allowing the use of an undisclosed disclaimer) because it does not fulfill the criterion laid down in G 1/03 that it is so unrelated to and remote from the claimed invention that the skilled person would never have taken it into consideration when making the invention, imply that it is automatically relevant for inventive step? [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  According to the record, this program was “a [l]earning [l]ab where students had access to computers for additional assistance in mathematics. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  According to the record, this program was “a [l]earning [l]ab where students had access to computers for additional assistance in mathematics. [read post]