Search for: "Microsoft v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2013, 10:39 pm
The Organization for an International Geographical Indications Network (oriGIn), a producers’ group lobbying in favour of GI, has issued a preliminary list of candidate GIs in the United States, just ahead of a the WIPO Working Group on the Development of the Lisbon System meeting. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 5:16 pm
The United States government was also caught expanding its jurisdiction across the Atlantic: After attempting to use a U.S. search warrant to seize data stored by Microsoft overseas, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals told the U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has already issued one ruling in Apple's favor against Google's Motorola (reversing and remanding an ITC ruling, which Google just asked it to reconsider), was clearly leaning Apple's way last month with respect to its continued pursuit of a permanent injunction against Samsung, and based on how today's appellate hearing on Judge Richard Posner's June 2012 dismissal of a two-way Apple v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:05 am
Microsoft LLC and DDR Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:56 am
Pildes analyzed the 1983 Supreme Court decision in INS v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 8:13 pm
In connection with the FTC's antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm, Magistrate Judge Nathaniel Cousins of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California crafted a "Christmas present" for Apple that the iPhone maker would probably have liked to return to the shop immediately: a sanctions order ($25K per day starting December 16) and a December 29 deadline for the production of documents. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 10:45 pm
One day after the United States International Trade Commission ("USITC" or just "ITC") instituted three investigations further to Ericsson v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:49 am
While the Supreme Court acknowledged that courts ordinarily presume that statutes apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, quoting Foley Bros. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:49 am
While the Supreme Court acknowledged that courts ordinarily presume that statutes apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, quoting Foley Bros. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
Their argument cited ongoing litigation in Mondelez International, Inc. v. [read post]
Verizon, advertising agencies and Ford want to go to bat for Judge Posner at Federal Circuit hearing
2 Aug 2013, 6:49 am
On September 11, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will conduct a hearing on the Apple v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Rest Easy (or Easier), Low-level Computer Technicians In United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:03 am
Some argue that an eBay v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:42 am
The most valuable one of Apple's three software patents-in-suit in the first case (most of the damages there relate to design patents, not software patents), the '915 pinch-to-zoom API patent, has meanwhile been rejected by the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Apple had to file an appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 12:27 pm
, United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm
Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had entered the following order on Tuesday (November 15):"The request by plaintiffs Epic and Match to file amended complaints, [...], is granted. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 4:46 am
By Dennis Crouch Briefing continues in the en banc appeal of TheraSense (Abbott) v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 11:43 am
Taniguchi v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:11 am
United States regarding the U.S. government’s efforts to require Microsoft to produce email messages stored outside the country; we explore the EU’s draft regulation prohibiting geo-blocking; and we take a look at UK Consumer Protection regulators’ efforts to combat undisclosed endorsements on social media. [read post]
