Search for: "Mitchell v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 1,001
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2015, 9:45 am by Thomas Schober
It’s too bad the United States Supreme Court didn’t issue its ruling in Comptroller v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:30 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States, 526 U.S. 314 (1999) (joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices O'Connor and Thomas) gives a bit of the background:Despite the text [of the Fifth Amendment], we held in Griffin v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am by Dan Ernst
Camillo, Historian, Mississippi River Commission, USACEJeffrey Mitchell Brideau, Post-Doctoral Researcher, IWR, USACEMatthew T. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:52 am by Kent Scheidegger
Woodall, decided one year ago today, the Supreme Court reviewed its precedent in Mitchell v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
Thus, the Excessive Fines Clause is violated where the fine is “grossly disproportional to the gravity of [the) offense” (United States v Bajakajlan, 524 US 321, 334 [1998]; see Canavan, 1 NY3d at 140). [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 4 March 2015 there was a unilateral statement in open court in the case of Rowland v Mitchell. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Alternative Green Technologies, Inc., Mitchell Segal, Belmont Partners, LLC, Joseph Meuse, Howard Borg, David Ryan, Vikram Khanna, and Panascope Capital Inc.Case Number: 11-cv-09056 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case Filed: December 12, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 15, 2014 1/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-6 SEC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 30 January 2015, there was a hearing in the case of Mitchell v NGN  before Mitting J. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:50 pm by Barry Sookman
Fitness Industry Council of Canada, 2014 FCA 48 Canadian Association of Film Distributors and Exporters v SODRAC 2014 FCA 235 Private Copying 2015, Copyright Board, December 12, 2014 United States American Broadcasting v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 8:39 am by Andrew Frisch
For this reason, and because it is from the United States’ highest court, wage and hour practitioners would be wise to read the entire decision. [read post]