Search for: "Neil Richards" Results 481 - 500 of 1,155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2017, 8:12 am by Christine Gannon
” The blocked travel ban may reach the Supreme Court, when Justice Neil Gorsuch will have a hand in the decision. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:00 am by Jeffrey Rosen
In Secret Government Searches and Digital Civil Liberties, Neil Richards tackles the issue of what he describes as “secret government searches”—namely, examples of government surveillance that remain a secret to the search target. [read post]
12 May 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” In Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Marcia Coyle reports that a “veteran high court advocate” has said that, based on new Justice Neil Gorsuch’s participation in oral arguments on April 13, “President Donald Trump ‘got what he was looking for’ in his U.S. [read post]
12 May 2017, 3:07 am by Neil Richards
In this excerpt from our new Digital Privacy initiative, Neil Richards from Washington University School of Law tackles the issue of “secret government searches”—namely, instances of government surveillance that remain secret to the search target. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:02 am by David Kris
”  It features a keynote address from Jeffrey Rosen, the President and CEO of the Center; papers from Jennifer Daskal, Jim Harper, Neil Richards, Christopher Slobogin, and me; and a group discussion on stage with the authors and a moderator, Tom Donnelly, before a live audience. [read post]
8 May 2017, 3:45 am by NCC Staff
  Secret Government Searches and Digital Civil Liberties Neil Richards tackles the issue of “secret government searches”—namely, instances of government surveillance that remain secret to the search target. [read post]
6 May 2017, 7:40 am
Posner for doubting that Neil Gorsuch cried while skiing when he heard that Justice Scalia died. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Hill, Brandon Carter reports that in an interview published yesterday, President Donald Trump “says he has personally swung the Supreme Court with his appointment of Justice Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
1 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” In USA Today, Richard Wolf looks at Justice Neil Gorsuch’s first two weeks on the bench, reporting that Gorsuch “comes as advertised,” and that “[t]wice in two weeks, the new justice’s devotion to texts and definitions appeared to rub up against his predecessor as junior justice, Elena Kagan. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 1:59 pm by John Dean
The attacks started during the presidential campaign, when candidate Donald Trump openly criticized U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 11:12 am by John Duffy
On the last day of scheduled oral arguments in the term, the Affordable Care Act — the always controversial “Obamacare” statute — returns yet again to the Supreme Court, although many of the justices and their clerks will probably be wishing it weren’t so. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “Supreme Court Justice Neil M. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm by Morgan Weiland
Richards, Neil, Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age (2015). [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday also marked Justice Neil Gorsuch’s debut on the Supreme Court bench. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports on the traditions that govern the life of the most junior justice, noting that Justice Neil Gorsuch will likely be “assigned to write mostly unanimous opinions in less-than-scintillating cases. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by James Kim
IN THE NEWS Neil Gorsuch was sworn in as an Associate Justice of the U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:20 am
"For Neil Gorsuch, Supreme Court job may seem subordinate": Richard Wolf of USA Today has this article, which includes a law professor's prediction of which opinion from the U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 10:09 am by Reproductive Rights
by Richard Storrow In the wake of the confirmation of Justice Neil Gorsuch, two experts have weighed in on the future of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]