Search for: "New v. Tolle" Results 481 - 500 of 2,700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2011, 11:50 pm
michaels-smolak.com Central NY Personal Injury Lawyer Michaels & Smolak, P.C. 1-315-253-3293 Toll Free 1-866-698-8169 [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 11:11 am
" http://www.kentucky.com/news/state/v-print/story/832118.html Bahe Cook Cantley and Jones personal injury lawyer Larry Jones said that the news is devastating, especially since so many pool deaths are preventable. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, in Elizabeth Arden, Inc. v Abelman, Frayne & Schwab , 2010 NY Slip Op 51836(U) Decided on October 22, 2010; Supreme Court, New York County;  Fried, J. it is not so easy. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
In 1996 the New York City Transit Authority reassigned Campbell to a lower grade position. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Court, after reviewing the documents in camera, finds that the NYPD has met its burden of proving exemption for these reports akin to Johnson v New York City Police Department. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 3:41 am
The toll of the limitations period provided by CPLR 208 is available "to only those individuals who are unable to protect their legal rights because of an over-all inability to function in society" (McCarthy v Volkswagen of Am., 55 NY2d 543, 548; Santo B. v Roman Catholic Archdiocese of N.Y., 51 AD3d 956, 958). [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 7:32 am
Box 807 Trenton, NJ 08625-0807 Phone: (609) 588-3139; (800) 792-8820 (Toll Free) Fax: (609) 588-3139 Web: http://www.state.nj.ushealth/senior/index.shtml AARP New Jersey Forrestal Village 132 Main Street Princeton, NJ 08540 Phone: (866) 542-8165 (Toll Free) Fax: (609) 987-4634 E-mail: njaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgstates/nj ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Northeast ADA & IT Center Cornell University 331 Ives Hall Ithaca, NY… [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 6:49 am
As a result of cases like Johnson v City of New York, the City has now taken an "aggressive stance" against claims brought by wounded bystanders who sue for injuries caused by stray police bullets. [read post]