Search for: "Nixon v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2018, 12:57 pm
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's years-old remarks questioning the landmark ruling that forced President Richard Nixon to turn over the Watergate tapes opened a new front in the battle over his confirmation, ensuring his views on executive power will square prominently in Senate hearings. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:02 pm
“Trump’s Shield on the Bench: Brett Kavanaugh’s criticism of United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:23 am
” At In These Times, James Gray Pope and others look at approaches to “rebuilding labor after the Supreme Court’s … ruling” in Janus v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 9:18 am
In a 1999 roundtable discussion, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court, suggested that United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:50 pm
Fyock v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:50 am
” President Richard Nixon had first nominated Clement Haynesworth and then G. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 12:44 pm
& Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:10 pm
This means making sure those conservative Democrats running for re-election in red states understand that they will need the support of their base, and particularly Democratic women who support Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
In other words, Roberts and Ginsburg were in unexpected positions.This reminded me of another Supreme Court case pertaining to state tax issues, 2015’s Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:28 am
Alvarez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:18 am
However, as I explained here, in State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
Alvarez v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
United States”Daniel J. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Richard Nixon was so named in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica and defended by the United States in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
Again, the president is not above the law (as the dissenters in Nixon v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:49 am
In other words, Nixon suffered severe political consequences. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm
In 1776 he served as a delegate to the state constitutional convention, where he made a mark as a thoughtful and devoted public servant. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 3:08 am
Nixon (defining a ‘ministerial duty’ as ‘a simple, definite duty, arising under conditions admitted or proved to exist, and imposed by law’), than the highly discretionary duty considered in Mississippi v. [read post]
