Search for: "North v. Superior Court"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,294
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2018, 5:50 am
The North Carolina Business Court sent a message to all lawyers practicing in the Business Court last week in Barclift v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
In the case of Winters v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 3:52 pm
The North Carolina Supreme Court concluded in State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 10:21 am
North Dakota ____U.S._____, 136 S. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 9:05 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 10:35 am
North Dakota? [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 6:54 pm
In a motion filed at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice – Commercial List on August 11, 2017, the lawyer for Retirees of Sears Canada cited s. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 2:00 am
There’s evidence of the value Jamie’s work in the recent North Carolina Supreme Court case State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:04 pm
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:51 pm
The court agreed with the plaintiff and remanded the case to the Superior Court. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
The Court noted its analysis was “compatible with North County Advocates v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 6:05 am
In 2004, 2006, and 2008, he worked for politicians running against North Carolina House of Representatives Member Robert Gillespie. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 11:17 am
The post State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:32 pm
The superior court denied the motion. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:59 am
A superior court judge denied the motion, and the defendant pled guilty and appealed. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:16 pm
” Cutter v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
"After these decisions by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Lamp and Farinacci, the Superior Court and the Commonwealth Court split on the issue of what constituted a good faith effort to complete service. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
In a published opinion filed September 28, 2017, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Alameda County Superior Court’s judgment denying appellant Living Rivers Council’s (LRC) writ petition challenging the State Water Resources Control Board’s (the “SWRCB” or “Board”) approval of a policy designed to maintain instream flows in coastal streams north of San Francisco. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
In a published opinion filed September 28, 2017, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Alameda County Superior Court’s judgment denying appellant Living Rivers Council’s (LRC) writ petition challenging the State Water Resources Control Board’s (the “SWRCB” or “Board”) approval of a policy designed to maintain instream flows in coastal streams north of San Francisco. [read post]
