Search for: "Novelty Inc." Results 481 - 500 of 765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2012, 12:14 pm by Phil
The following is excerpted from a January 4, 2012 AMEC press release published by PR Newswire: Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment Inc. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:30 am by ipelton
(click mark or image for USPTO records): SHOVEL READY FOR ELECTION DAY 2012 - Bumper stickers; Decorative stickers for helmets; Magnetic bumper stickers; Paper banners; Stickers and transfers; Hats; Hooded sweat shirts; Polo shirts; Shirts; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Campaign buttons; Novelty buttons 2012 – cigars  - long list of goods and services - Belts; Eyeshades; Footwear; Hats; Hooded sweat shirts; Jackets; Jeans; Jerseys; Jogging pants;… [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 11:35 pm by Lara
 What do novelty stores and Zombies have in common? [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:33 pm by Timothy Lee, Ars Technica
There’s no Bitcoin Inc. to compete directly with Western Union, but the owners of Bitcoins can be thought of as shareholders in a decentralized Western Union alternative. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:26 am by Bexis
McNeil-PPC, Inc., ___ N.Y.S.2d ___, 2011 WL 5865657 (N.Y.A.D. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:11 pm by Alex Gasser
The complaint defines LELO Inc., LELOi AB, LELO, Natural Contours Europe, Momentum Management, and Evolved Novelties as “Manufacturer Respondents,” who manufacture, design, sell for importation, import, and/or sell after importation infringing kinesiotherapy devices and components thereof that use Standard Innovation’s patented technologies. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:27 am
In May 2010, intellectual property counsel for Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc., both of New York, NY, had filed an infringement suit alleging Novelty, Inc. of Greenfield, IN, has infringed numerous COACH trademarks which have been registered with the U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:12 pm
First, he set about the task of deciding the basis on which he could assess whether the contribution described in Claim 33 was technical (and therefore having at least a chance of gaining patent protection, assuming that all the other boxes, like novelty and inventive step, were ticked), having regard to the recent body of case law on the subject which included Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd, Symbian Ltd v  Comptroller of Patents and Halliburton Energy Services… [read post]