Search for: "OPINION OF THE JUSTICES TO THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES."
Results 481 - 500
of 1,459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2022, 4:35 pm
Challenges to discriminatory housing practices, he observed, may arise after “testers” express interest in a house and are victims of racial discrimination; courts don’t require the testers to show that they actually would have bought the house before the lawsuit can move forward. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:37 pm
In footnote 3 of his opinion dissenting from the en banc D.C. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 7:56 am
There is a proper political means to affect or change how the justices exercise their power: an elected president may nominate judges based on their judicial philosophy and an elected Senate may confirm or reject nominees on that same basis. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 10:06 am
The excesses of the Starr investigation, the case against impeaching a president for private personal failures and the direction of public opinion had a clear effect on the course and duration of proceedings in the Senate, if not the House. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:57 am
Chamber of Commerce was cited by the Court in its opinion. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 10:00 am
House of Representatives and Senate. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:14 pm
Circuit will soon enough find itself reviewing this opinion carefully — if it stands — should the House of Representatives flip this fall. [read post]
8 May 2011, 9:09 am
That's why it saddens me that the Florida Legislature has again passed a series of laws which will make it increasingly difficult for injured Floridians to seek justice for their injuries at the hands of negligent doctors and nurses.This week, the Florida Senate passed the Florida House of Representative's bill, number 479, which sets sweeping new rules for how malpractice attorneys can pursue justice and how victims of medical accidents can… [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
[Disclosure: my law school clinic represented amici supporting the respondents in the case.] [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 2:04 pm
Currently, the Judiciary Committee, which has favored privacy in the past, and the chairs of the Intelligence Committees, Senator Dianne Feinstein and Representative Mike Rogers, will be introducing bills tackling the NSA spying. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am
As they say, “The rule of law does not, by itself, guarantee justice, but without it just laws cannot be upheld and unjust ones peacefully reformed. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 7:27 pm
Yet the senators on the Judiciary Committee unanimously decided to entrust Senators Blumenthal and Graham with fixing the problem. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 4:20 pm
House of Representatives. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
§§ 1541-48) to the Supreme Court’s 1983 opinion in INS v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:17 pm
But the chances of that amendment gaining approval in the House of Representatives, under Democratic control, seem non-existent. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:00 am
Must transmit a copy of the judicial performance review of each justice and judge who is up for retention to the Senate President and the Speaker of the House of Representatives at least 60 days before the regular primary election. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 am
His sexual orientation strikes me as no more relevant to how he will rule than the race of white Supreme Court justices was when (with Thurgood Marshall) they failed to side with white American public opinion and overturned "miscegenation" laws in Loving v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:29 am
Last week, in a brave and stunning vote, the Illinois House of Representatives voted to abolish the death penalty in Illinois, 11 years after former Gov. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm
Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) disagrees and is reportedly brandishing a Congressional Research Service (CRS) opinion letter described, but not released, by the far right blog, Breitbart, which suggests that Congress can bar appropriated funds, including user fees, from being deployed in a way that contravenes a statute. [read post]
