Search for: "Office of Federal Acknowledgment" Results 481 - 500 of 8,471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court acknowledged that the First Amendment doesn't bar social media platforms from acting on their own to restrict user speech, since the First Amendment applies only to the government and not to private parties (including large corporations). [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
To see why, consider two hypothetical cases.First suppose that you are a juror in a case in which the pilot of an airplane is charged with flying the plane while drunk, a serious federal offense. [read post]
Most notably, this included a case where ACE had successfully argued that submitting false certifications to the federal government was separate from a professional service. [read post]
The PO had attempted to serve its complaint at two of the petitioner’s office locations more than one year before the petition was filed. [read post]
The PO had attempted to serve its complaint at two of the petitioner’s office locations more than one year before the petition was filed. [read post]
The PO had attempted to serve its complaint at two of the petitioner’s office locations more than one year before the petition was filed. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 9:30 am by Berry Law
Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) is a federal appellate court that reviews board decisions. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 8:30 am by Doug Cornelius
What the SEC did not like is a representation earlier in the form separation agreement: Employee represents and acknowledges [t]hat Employee has not filed any complaint or charges against CBRE, or any of its respective subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, predecessors, successors, officers, directors, shareholders, employees, representatives or agents (hereinafter collectively “Agents”), with any state or federal court or local, state or federal… [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:47 am by Holly
The USPTO does not investigate Section 15 declarations but merely acknowledges receiving them. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am by Justin Chan
According to a federal lawsuit later filed by Mr. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am by Phil Dixon
The former circuit rule was an outlier among the federal circuit courts of appeals; few other federal circuits followed such a strict interpretation of the meaning of a “prevailing party. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:58 am by Karina Lytvynska
It’s worth noting that the average cost of litigating a copyright infringement case in federal court from pre-trial through the appeals process is about $278,00 [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:11 am by Xiangnong (George) Wang
To support this point, Schneier cited a recent report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which explained that the wide range of commercially available information sold by data brokers is already readily available to foreign governments. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:55 am by Patryk I. Labuda
With Ukraine’s Presidential Office hinting that diplomatic negotiations cannot drag on forever and should ideally be finalized by the end of 2023, there is now talk of a compromise solution consisting of a third State’s – as opposed to Ukraine’s – jurisdiction serving as a base to ground the Special Tribunal’s powers. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Susan Dudley
  Draft Merger Guidelines As other posts in this series have observed, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
In a discussion with The Regulatory Review, former Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) Susan Dudley offers her thoughts about important guidelines federal agencies use to analyze new regulations before they adopt them. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
 The federal judge overseeing the case appeared to tell him no recently. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am by Unknown
Gary Peters (D-Mich), would require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to establish the Chief Artificial Intelligence Officers Council for purposes of coordinating federal agencies’ best practices for the use of AI.As the one academic on the panel, Hartzog sought to debunk what he viewed as myths about AI regulation. [read post]