Search for: "Officer Oxley" Results 481 - 500 of 1,090
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 4:05 am by David Lynn
CEOs and chief financial officers (CFOs) remain subject to the clawback provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), which provide that if a company is required to prepare an accounting restatement because of “misconduct,” the CEO and CFO are required to reimburse the company for any incentive or equity-based compensation and profits from selling company securities received during the year following issuance of the inaccurate financial statements. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 8:48 am by Ilyse Schuman
OSHA is charged with enforcing the whistleblower provisions in 22 separate statutes, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), Affordable Care Act, and the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act. [read post]
12 Jul 2006, 2:12 am
While in the wake of Sarbanes-Oxley we have certainly moved closer to a federal corporate law, the business judgment rule has not yet become part of the SEC's lexicon. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 11:49 am
These sections close loopholes in the anti-retaliation provisions in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX"), a corporate whistleblower law, by covering subsidiaries of publicly traded companies. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 8:18 am
Meanwhile, business representatives and some lawmakers are urging the SEC to ease the internal control requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and to exempt smaller companies. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:55 am by David Feldman
Since Sarbanes-Oxley passed in 2002, unfortunately, your auditing firm is forced to be more adversarial with their own client than ever. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:24 am
Going through periods of activism, gradual transition, and stagnation, the process intensified with the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank Acts. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 9:16 pm
Like, say, moving an employee’s desk from the front of the office to an “annex” inhabited by the employee’s chatty, fashion-crazed, quasi (ex?) [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:11 pm by Brian F. LaBovick, Esq.
  Any loopholes that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act had on the issue of corporate whistle blowing against the subsidiaries of publicly traded companies are also now closed. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 9:51 pm
Attorney's office in Manhattan, referring to her company, Daylight Forensics. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 2:46 am
Absent other particularized indications of fraud, the fact that the officers signed Sarbanes-Oxley certifications and could profit from the merger were insufficient to show individual scienter. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:47 am by Employment Lawyers
Employees of publicly traded companies have some protection if they identify business practices intended to defraud shareholders under Sarbanes-Oxley ("SOX"). [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 9:13 pm
Schwartz of Nichols Kaster & Anderson's office in San Francisco then spoke on strategies in representing federal employees as whistleblowers. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Sarbanes-Oxley is the most well known legislation. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:17 pm
They might just have some budget dollars left for that Windows Vista upgrade or the move to Office 2007. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:19 am
Over the last couple of decades, Congress has decided that executives should pay back that incentive-based compensation. [1] Congress first mandated these clawbacks under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, requiring chief executives and chief financial officers to return incentive-based pay in cases of misconduct from the previous 12 months. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:55 am
One of the draw: U.S-trained lawyers tend to have a greater familiarity with the Sarbanes-Oxley corporate governance reforms - that's a skill that Chinese companies - with an eye to an overseas stock market listing need.With the law firm market increasingly uncertain, a number of U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Carolyn Moskowitz
   Critics argue that the legislation will circumvent internal compliance programs, including those premised on the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 12:58 pm by Jeffrey M. Hanna
Imagine you are a federal prosecutor and the following fact pattern lands on your desk: a college student has gained unauthorized access to the email account of a candidate for federal office. [read post]