Search for: "P, P, M " Results 481 - 500 of 30,703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 7:26 am
Repita as informações da referência e as páginas referidas.5) Lista de referências no final;6) 15-25 páginas, incluindo lista de referências no final.Link: https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/rdiImportantes considerações:- Somente abordagens de Direito Internacional e de Direito Comparado serão consideradas. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:26 am by Christine Corcos
Repita as informações da referência e as páginas referidas.5) Lista de referências no final;6) 15-25 páginas, incluindo lista de referências no final.Link: https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/rdiImportantes considerações:- Somente abordagens de Direito Internacional e de Direito Comparado serão consideradas. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:48 pm by Béligh Elbalti
Similarly, Mathias Reimann describes it as “intimate” (M Reimann, “Comparative Law and Private International Law”, in M Reimann and R Zimmermann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (2nd ed., OUP, 2019) p. 1340). [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:54 am by The Murray Law Firm
” AL.com is reporting, “[p]olice said the victim, a 22-year-old man, was airlifted from the scene and was in critical condition Saturday. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 12:45 am by JR Chaves
Sin embargo, la música de las campanas al vuelo durará poco. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1]  [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words on January 6… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales, 2024 QCCA 30Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), QuébecDécision de : Juges Robert M. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
S&M cases are fascinating in thinking about consent and criminality. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 12:17 am by JR Chaves
Y por ello, comprendo y comparto la conclusión del autor: Contamos con un Derecho garantista frente al poder público más extendido, el Derecho administrativo, pero tenemos que reconstruirlo o reorientarlo para establecer un cuadro de garantías frente a poderes privados y para garantizar la atención al interés general que supuestamente hacían valer los poderes públicos”. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:58 pm by gA
Acá, primera entrega del año.Cada uno de estos fallos es importante por diversas razones, y todos están abriendo brechas, o consolidando líneas jurisprudenciales preexistentes en el desarrollo de derechos y garantías.El título descriptivo de cada ítem enlaza al fallo que el párrafo describe. [read post]