Search for: "PEREZ V JUSTICE"
Results 481 - 500
of 548
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2009, 6:02 am
Perez, 391 N.J. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 11:23 pm
Rivero v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:29 pm
” Id. at 275 (quoting Perez v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:47 am
For Further Reading: The Cruz-Perez decision incorrectly flips the lead Supreme Court decision's name: the correct cite is Irizarry v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
This edition of "Petitions to Watch" features cases up for consideration at the Justices' private conference on June 11. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 5:48 am
Perez, No. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO review of UDRP disputes - record number of complaints handled by WIPO in 2008 (WIPO) (Out-Law) (Michael Geist) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Class 46) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) Goverment outlines new creative industries’ Digital Rights Agency proposed in Digital Britain report (Out-Law) (IP finance) (Intellectual… [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:54 pm
The musical interlude occurred in Alito's major ruling in Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:48 am
When 33-year-old Rogelio V. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 10:45 am
HOME, Link v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 9:48 am
There, of course, is a lot more in there, but I'll leave that to the PRA nerds ;) Perez v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
See Justice Alito’s introduction in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 4:27 am
$2,000,000 in March 2008 for a young girl in a Bronx apartment (Guttierrez v. 824 South East Boulevard Realty, Inc.; Index # 15630/94) $4,650,000 in October 2007 for a four year old boy in Brooklyn (Perez v. 2246 Holding Corp.; Index # 1683/04) $3,500,000 in March 2007 for a young girl in a Brooklyn apartment (Bernardez v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
o SCOTUS docket hereBowie v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:05 am
The California Supreme Court invalidated the state's anti-miscegenation statute on state constitutional grounds in Perez v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 4:52 am
Garre argued five cases before the Supreme Court last term: for the respondent in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:42 pm
That's, again, different than your usual case.Nonetheless, lots of what Justice Yegan says (in affirming the trial court's decision) rings true to me. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
The Court conclusion: they are subject to both laws.As to the Open Meetings Law, Justice NeMoyer said:"In enacting the Open Meetings Law, the Legislature sought to ensure that public business be performed in an open and public manner and that the citizens of this state be fully aware of and able to observe the performance of public officials and attend and listen to the deliberations and decisions that go into the making of public policy' (Public Officers Law §… [read post]
