Search for: "PERSON v. STATE" Results 481 - 500 of 84,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2015, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
In Kerner v (1) WX (2) YZ (Persons Unknown), Mr Justice Warby has continued an harassment injunction and ordered disclosure against the DVLA so that the claimants can obtain details which may track down the respondents, a photographer and his associate. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 2:25 pm by Legal Writer
The Barney Rule: Pets are Personal Property A 2002 decision by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania decided that pets are personal property in the State of Pennsylvania. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 2:25 pm by Legal Writer
The Barney Rule: Pets are Personal Property A 2002 decision by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania decided that pets are personal property in the State of Pennsylvania. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:38 am by Laura Orr
(Even if the officer can recite “Miranda Warnings” by heart, and most can, they are not infrequently advised to read them from a printed card, primarily to avoid any dispute over dropped words or phrases, however inadvertent.)The June 30, 2010, Oregon Court of Appeals case, State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 12:08 pm by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
Additionally, for nonresident defendants, a Florida court has personal jurisdiction if the defendant is served with process while present within the state, see Beverley Beach Props. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:46 pm by Reproductive Rights
Rick Perry categorized abortion as a states’ rights issue today, saying that if Roe v.... [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:14 am
R (Incorporated Trustees of the National Council on Ageing (Age Concern England)) v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Case C-388/07); [2009] WLR(D) 82 “National rules allowing compulsory dismissal at retirement age and non-recruitment of persons of retirement age were not contrary to Community law provided that they were justified by legitimate social [...] [read post]