Search for: "PRICE v. CORPORATION COMMISSION"
Results 481 - 500
of 911
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:27 am
Supreme Court held in Fifth Third Bank v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Thus, false representations around a firm’s own, or it’s competitor’s, products can be legally actionable, as the Supreme Court again ruled this year in a case about beverage labeling (Pom Wonderful v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:40 am
P’ship v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:35 pm
Today’s opinion in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:15 am
Z Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 3:12 am
Emerson (pictured above) in a case called Federico v Brancato, 2014 NY Slip Op 50902(U) [Sup Ct, Suffolk County June 9, 2014]. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
See Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 8:22 am
Affirming dismissal in Z Technologies v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
The response to the Kutak Commission’s proposal generated a new phrase, “Fear of Sears”[2]: One question and its answer derailed any possibility of the MDP and corporate investment proposal during the House of Delegates debate on the package of Kutak Commission proposals; “Does this mean Sears can open a law firm? [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:08 am
., v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
The statute does provide such a principle: Amtrak “shall be operated and managed as a for-profit corporation. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The Sebelius v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 12:07 pm
In early July, after announcing the miss, Informatica’s stock price fell 27% from $43 to $31. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
The Supreme Court majority in McCutcheon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
(Backer, Larry Catá, The Cooperative as Proletarian Corporation: Property Rights between Corporation, Cooperatives and Globalization in Cuba. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 3:34 am
” The intent of each section is similar: to enable the court to preserve corporate property for the benefit of shareholders and creditors; while section 1115 looks prospectively, to prevent improper future actions injurious to the corporate estate, section 1114 operates retrospectively permitting the court to set aside past injurious acts which, as alleged here, have come to light only after their commission. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
At Least In Principle http://t.co/FC7rv9BtMY -> Will the federal government reduce the price gap on books? [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
At Least In Principle http://t.co/FC7rv9BtMY -> Will the federal government reduce the price gap on books? [read post]
