Search for: "PRICE v. VIRGINIA"
Results 481 - 500
of 814
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2022, 12:12 pm
Pricing: Single price, $150 for first user plus $50 per additional user. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am
Virginia, 16-1348 Issue: Whether a defendant who consents to severance of multiple charges into sequential trials loses his right under the double jeopardy clause to the issue-preclusive effect of an acquittal. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:12 pm
Pricing: Single price, $150 for first user plus $50 per additional user. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
The PUC, however, declined to announce such a price — so the parties fell back to the $50 figure. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark’s new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION – the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v… [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
– Myriad stock prices: Association of Molecular Pathology v USPTO (Innovationpartners) US: Federal judge in Myriad patent case says invalidation of gene patents does not violate TRIPS: Association of Molecular Pathology v USPTO (KEI) US: ACLU gene patent decision from an investor’s perspective: A black eye for the US patent system: Association of Molecular Pathology v USPTO (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) US: Association of Molecular Pathology… [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am
Last up is Bufkin v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
First, in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:45 am
Specifically, in the 2004 case of Metropolitan Intercollegiate Basketball Ass'n v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:29 am
The Reporters cite Badie v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
Virginia State Bar, 421 U.S. 773, 791 (1975). [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 5:52 am
Attorney from the Western District of Virginia. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
In 2000, the Supreme Court decided Mitchell v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 6:48 pm
Alaska Statutes § 09.17.010; State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decided West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
Ct. 1577, 1584 (2010) (quoting R.A.V.); Virginia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:07 am
While this decision relied on Maryland law, courts in Virginia have followed this standard. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: District Court C D California: another victory for Web 2.0, transcoding doesn’t block ‘safe harbor’ defence: Universal Music Group v Veoh (EFF), (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) (Out-Law) Apple ditches DRM; gives record labels variable iTunes pricing… [read post]
