Search for: "Pace v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 1,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2009, 3:13 pm
Conservative social movement activity explains the sluggish move to integrate public schools after the landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
This Kat is however concerned about the leisurely pace at which this litigation, initiated in 2008, has meandered through the courts. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Cooper to Reconsider Takings Claim — David Newhoff writes a briskly paced recap of state sovereign immunity and the latest development involving the district court in Allen v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Paralleling that, but apparently at a faster pace is the liberalization as to what is permitted in modern art. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:05 am
Jimenez-Guiterrez (available here) and the Tenth Circuit discussed the obligation to state reasons in US v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The Minister for Privacy and Freedom of Information, Brendan O’Connor, stated in a press release that it is vital that Australia’s privacy laws and protections are keeping pace with technological changes. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 1:36 pm by Law Offices of Ralph Behr
Wyoming law in this field has been developing at a rapid pace compared to similarly situated states and federal lawmakers. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 2:17 am by gmlevine
Stanley Pace, D2010-1711 (WIPO December 7, 2010), and cases cited therein; trademarks descriptive of the complainant’s services on assertions alone do not, ElderCare Advocates, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 10:02 am
Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc., 105 F.3d 1090, 1100 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 (1998)). [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While incontrovertible proof of fraud is not required at the pleading stage, CPLR 3016[b] mandates particularity such that elementary facts from which misconduct may be inferred must be stated (see Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, supra). [read post]