Search for: "Parcell v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 am
To understand how we got to Janus v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am
United Parcel Service, in which the Court sent the case of a female UPS driver who became pregnant back to the lower court for it to reconsider its ruling, was “an important victory for pregnant workers,” but she also urges Congress to take action to “affirm and strengthen this decision. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:53 am
United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:10 pm
In Clarendon America Insurance Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm
At the time the Convention was crafted, it could not have been envisaged that Article 3 (and Article 8, in its train) would ultimately entail an obligation on signatory states to protect individuals from actions taken by, or within the territory of, non signatory states – the so called “extra-territorial effect” created by various rulings of the Strasbourg Court, most notably Chahal v United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
” United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:27 pm
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. includes owners of 5 of the 448 parcels affected by a renourishment project. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:18 pm
United Parcel Service, 251 F.R.D. 476 (C.D. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am
Sigalit v Kahlon Last week, in Sigalit v Kahlon, 21-cv-08921 (SDNY Aug. 30, 2023) United States District Judge Analisa Torres granted the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on an accounting claim. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:07 pm
By Glen Hansen In Zanelli v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:41 am
E&H Land, Ltd. v Farmington City E&H sold a small parcel of land to City. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:06 pm
” In Saffie v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:20 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that UPS did not have to afford a pregnant employee an accommodation relative to an essential job function. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 8:22 am
Zimmerman v Wabaunsee County. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 3:32 pm
[VDARE partly complied with the subpoena, but later sued] in United States District Court for the Northern District of New York … [VDARE Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 9:40 pm
Construing the policy in favor of the insureds and resolving all ambiguities in the insureds' favor, as we must (see United States Fid. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
”Once it was established that adults in the United States had the right to buy and use contraception, the attention shifted to access. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm
That provision empowers the president to deny entry to foreign nationals when entry would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 2:42 pm
Bunn v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
United Parcel Service, 124 So.3d 36 (La. [read post]
