Search for: "Paris v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 1,255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
The Paris Criminal Court of Appeal awarded a total amount of 13 million euros and 12 months’ imprisonment in the case of D.M. v APP, Microsoft, Sacem and others, available in French language here.Monday Miscellany and Sunday SurprisesPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 158 [week ending Sunday 30 July] The right of communication to the public ... in a chart I From Coca-Cola Zero to Coca-Cola Zero Sugar: big deal or no deal? [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm by Gordon Firemark
Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode: William Faulkner’s suit against Sony Pictures and Woody Allen; Warner Brothers has won an important victory in the Superman litigation, Albert Einstein’s likeness is now in the public domain, and a group representing talent managers is suing California officials over the state’s licensing statute for agents and much more… HOSTS Gordon Firemark Website: http://firemark.com http://theatrelawyer.com,… [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am by Victoria VanBuren
GUEST-POST PART I | States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Conversant v LG: No FRAND rate in sight, as the Paris Cour d'appel tackles essentiality and German trade secrets | Does a “Launch At Risk” Automatically Exclude the Right to Appropriate Compensation for a Wrongfully-Issued Preliminary Injunction? [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The first rounds of merits briefs have now been submitted to the Supreme Court in Impression Prods. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
The defendants had put the photographs of the Paris catwalk shows on their public website. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:01 am by Florian Mueller
Two weeks ago, the Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (TJP), which was known as the Tribunal de Grande Instance (TGI) until the turn of the year, handed down an order in TCL v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 3:59 am
In 2012 the TGI Paris (Court of First Instance) dismissed his action, but the following year the Paris Court of Appeal reversed the decision and awarded damages for EUR 50,000.The case eventually reached the French Supreme Court, which in 2015 noted that a fair balance must be struck between copyright protection and the protection of third parties’ freedom of expression, which includes artistic expression. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
  This Kat notes with pleasure that Gadi Oron has been appointed Director General of the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC), based in Paris. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
Out on the west, Alicante hosts the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, which administers Community trade marks and designs, while London, Paris and Milan are generally hives of IP activity, speculation and intrigue. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
 For example, as was stated in Generics (UK) Limited and others v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] UKHL 12: “National courts may reach different conclusions as to the evaluation of the evidence in the light of the relevant principles, but the principles themselves should be the same, stemming as they do from the EPC. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
. ____ Q: What is the name of the wood pavement patentee in City of Elizabeth v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:37 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Against the background of recent investment disputes (Philip Morris v Uruguay and Philip Morris v Australia) and recent trade agreements with ISDS norms (the United States – Mexico – Canada Agreement, USMCA, and the EU/Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA), this chapter addresses the impact of ISDS on public health regulation.In Chapter 7, the author discusses how the US shaped the provisions on geographical indications in TPP-11. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 11:08 am
The plaintiff wife and defendant husband were married in Paris, France, in 1965. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The federal court — indicating that respondent may have violated added requirements to report expenses in excess of $100, to limit hiring at his law firm and restrict support staff to two full-time staff members — referred the matter for prosecution by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Baker v Dorfman, 2006 WL 988747 [SD NY 2006]). [read post]