Search for: "Paul Clement" Results 481 - 500 of 1,391
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm by Marty Lederman
  (I discuss this “substantial pressure” standard further hereand here.)Paul Clement offered three basic responses to this line of argument. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:13 am by Lyle Denniston
Argentina’s lawyer, Paul Clement, took that government’s latest case to the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 May 2014, 4:58 am by Walter Olson
Paul Barrett at Bloomberg BusinessWeek: Judge Edith Brown Clement is waving her arms, jumping up and down —- heck, doing everything but setting her office furniture on fire —- to draw the attention of the U.S. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
Paul Clement rises for the Ralls Corporation to address Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson, Janice Rogers Brown and Roger Wilkins and begins by challenging two premises of the lower court’s conclusions: first, its substantive dismissal of Ralls’s due process claims against the president, and second, its determination that the president’s order mooted Ralls’ claims against CFIUS. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:59 am by Amy Howe
First up was former Solicitor General Paul Clement (yes, him again), arguing on behalf of ABC and the other networks. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:40 am by Devlin Hartline
As they had argued in their reply brief, the petitioners, represented by Paul D. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:26 am
 As Paul Clement wrote when he resigned from King & Spalding: Defending unpopular positions is what lawyers do. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:32 am by Ben
 Justice Stephen Breyer told the networks' attorney, Paul Clement, that his legal argument "makes me nervous about taking your preferred route" and that  he was concerned about what a decision “will do for other technologies. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:30 pm by Joe Mullin
" she asked Paul Clement, the lawyer representing ABC and other TV networks. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
Clement, was not in the reassuring business on Tuesday. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:17 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
The Aereo case was argued this morning, and before Paul Clement could even get rolling on his introduction on behalf of the broadcaster plaintiffs, Justice Sotomayor hit him with this: JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: Why aren’t [companies like Aereo] cable companies? [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:17 pm by Bruce Boyden
The Aereo case was argued this morning, and before Paul Clement could even get rolling on his introduction on behalf of the broadcaster plaintiffs, Justice Sotomayor hit him with this: JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: Why aren’t [companies like Aereo] cable companies? [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am by Ronald Mann
I should also mention a powerful amicus brief from Paul Clement, writing on behalf of the ABA – in this case neither the American Bar Association nor the American Bankers Association, but instead the American Beverage Association. [read post]
Yet at the oral argument, many Justices, especially Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor but also Chief Justice Roberts, pressed Hobby Lobby’s lawyer, Paul Clement, on just how far his religious-exemption argument might extend. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 5:04 am by Steve Shiffrin
In the oral argument in the Hobby Lobby case the other day, Paul Clement argued for the corporation and characterized the central issue as “who’s going to pay for the government subsidy” of insurance for expensive contraceptives such as the IUD. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:15 pm by David Gans
  Justices Sotomayor, Ginsburg, and Kagan all pressed Paul Clement to explain how courts should handle such claims. [read post]